Hi.
We had an issue where one of the riak servers died (had to be force removed
from cluster). After we did that things got really bad and most data was
unreachable for hours. I added a new node to replace the old one at one
point as well - that never got any data and even now about a day later it
either of these work, let us know and we'll take a deeper look.
> Specifically:
>
> a) any log files you could send along would be helpful
> b) the output of the following diagnostic:
>
> f(Members).
> Members = riak_core_ring:all_members(element(2,
> riak_core_
Well, I'm in this situation atm. I guess I could go and change the max_results
setting but really - this actually
means that I can't search my data and to me, it's more important to be able to
search than to get an error when
my index has grown too large. I understand that there's nothing for thi
I do know about this bug https://issues.basho.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965 though I
wonder if I'm really encountering it.
I've got 3 nodes running, one of the nodes always answers fine with json output
- the other two always answers with the
error below (when encountering certain documents I assume):
The startup scripts for riak and riaksearch don't work particularly well with
runit (riaksearch console doesn't seem to do it). I suppose this
is because of the special way that riak is started. Anyone have a pointer to
where I can read about the startup procedure? Or would you
recommend against
First a little background:
We've been putting videos in luwak without much trouble for quite a while now,
small and a little bigger (by bigger I mean around 6 or 7 megs).
To stream these so far, we've basically done this:
Get the web app to download the video over http from luwak and store on l
gzip
> compressor individually, whereas browsers would expect the entire response
> to be a single gzip blob (with a single header/checksum). At least, that's
> why the gzip thing didn't work. Not sure why Safari broke even when you
> turned that off.
>
> On Tue, Se
Last night we did two things. First we upgraded our entire cluster from
riak-search 0.14.2 to 1.0.1. This process went
pretty well and the cluster was responding correctly after this was completed.
In our cluster we have around 40 000 files stored in Luwak (we also have about
the same amount of
, we apologize for the
> inconvenience and irritation this has caused.
>
> Kelly
>
>
> On Oct 28, 2011, at 9:14 AM, John Axel Eriksson wrote:
>
>> Last night we did two things. First we upgraded our entire cluster from
>> riak-search 0.14.2 to 1.0.1. This proc
think
it's only the larger files stored in luwak
that have this problem.
John
29 okt 2011 kl. 01:03 skrev John Axel Eriksson:
> I've got the utmost respect for developers such as yourselves(Basho) and
> we've had great success using Riak - we have been using it
> in p
rough all the 40 000 files and trying to determine
which ones aren't there anymore or are just garbage…).
John
8 nov 2011 kl. 11:35 skrev John Axel Eriksson:
> Thanks for the emails detailing this issue - private and to the list. I've
> got a question for the list on our situati
Is it possible to incrementally add to a file in Luwak using PUT and the
Content-Range header. I just assumed that it was but I can't seem to
get the expected results, it just overwrites whatever the key contents were
before. The reason I want to do this is because we have some pretty
large files I
## the second write here gets an Exception - I think it's a 400 from
riak
puts "writing..."
output_stream.write(buffer,0,bytes_read)
sleep 1
end
end
rescue Exception => e
puts "Exception: #{e.message}"
end
puts c.response_code rescue nil
puts c.r
Wow. Is this for real? I almost can't believe it. This is the feature we
use most in Riak, we really depend on it and have quite a lot of data
stored. Suddenly Riak became a dead-end for us. We've used Riak for more
than a year and have invested quite a lot of time in it. This is indeed
very sad ne
We're in the process of migrating our webapps to Rails 3 (some from PHP to
Rails 3 even). I'm the one responsible
for our new Amazon EC2 setup.
We've been looking at new ways of storing our data (quite alot of files but
also data which was previously in a MySQL DB).
So, I've been trying out Mon
I'm not exactly an expert on Rails but I've built a few simpler apps. Now
I'm working on an app using Ripple and I'm having a few issues, perhaps
I just haven't grasped riak/ripple yet...
Anyway...
class Client
include Ripple::Document
timestamps!
property :name, String
property :ho
n
>
>
>
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 2:48 PM, John Axel Eriksson wrote:
>
>> I'm not exactly an expert on Rails but I've built a few simpler apps. Now
>> I'm working on an app using Ripple and I'm having a few issues, perhaps
>> I just haven
I know the recommendation of max 50 megs per file in riak currently... but I
tried
uploading a file that was around 120 megs and everything went fine. I downloaded
it again from riak and did an md5 on the original and the downloaded file and
got
the same hash... so what does this mean? I just got
Listing keys in a bucket has been described as "bad" and something you use in
development but
not in production. I'm just starting out on Riak so I'm a newbie...
I'm thinking of building an application using Riak as filestorage and possibly
much more than that, but it would
at least store lots o
v Matthew Scott:
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:31, John Axel Eriksson wrote:
> Listing keys in a bucket has been described as "bad" and something you use in
> development but
> not in production. I'm just starting out on Riak so I'm a newbie...
>
&g
her styles of
> data stores, but is part of the tradeoff involved.
>
> --
> Matthew Scott
> ElevenCraft, Inc.
> http://11craft.com/
> +1 360 389-2512
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:51, John Axel Eriksson wrote:
> Yes, I've thought of this but as I understand
o.jpg" (file)
>
> (note I escape the slashes in the key names)
>
> With proper use of links and tags, this is not a difficult problem. If you
> just want to mount Riak like a file system, you might look at Artur Bergman's
> riakfuse project.
>
> Sean Cribbs
>
I've been rewriting a small app of ours to run on Riak instead of MongoDB and
I've run into a bug or weird behavior. To show this off I created a very simple
little
Rails 3 app where this happens. It can be found here:
git://github.com/johnae/Riak-Rails-Ripple-Test-to-show-some-weird-behavior.git
Yeah, well it looks like that. I haven't had any problems with associating an
address to a client
through rails console for example but then I would do:
client = Client.new(:name => 'someclient')
client.address = Address.new(:address => 'abcde' )
client.save
The problem is in the form building,
24 matches
Mail list logo
