I just ran a script on a my dev machine to remove everything in the
local riaksearch instance. In the process, I found something very
strange. Specifically, there exists objects in my instance that
cannot be deleted (I get an error whenever I try) and that always
appear with their data intact.
H
tps://issues.basho.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970
>
> Francisco
>
> 2011/2/18 Gary William Flake :
>> I just ran a script on a my dev machine to remove everything in the
>> local riaksearch instance. In the process, I found something very
>> strange. Specifically, there exists objects in my i
I've been pulling my hair out over new behaviors with search-schema,
and I am wondering if I've been simply doing it wrong. Here's the
issue: search-schema seem extremely brittle compared to the rest of
the system in that one misstep requires that you effectively blow away
your whole DB and try ag
While coding up a front-end to paginate over a set of search results, I
think I found a bug whereby the result set is incorrectly segmented as a
function of the sort key, the start index, and the row count. In the output
that follows, I am using the field ctime for sort order, and the value of
del
scheduled to be fixed?
Thanks,
-- GWF
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Gary William Flake wrote:
> While coding up a front-end to paginate over a set of search results, I
> think I found a bug whereby the result set is incorrectly segmented as a
> function of the sort key, the start
bug.cgi?id=867) We have not yet scheduled
> the fix for this.
>
> Best,
> Rusty
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Gary William Flake wrote:
>
>> Ack. I know what's happening with this. Riaksearch is sorting by
>> relevance, segmenting the results acco
Now trying 500 lines.
-- GWF
tail-sasl-error.log
Description: Binary data
On May 6, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Gary William Flake wrote:
> Resending with only the last 1000 lines from the log file, so that the list
> server doesn't reject it.
>
> Any insights would be gr
a), and see if there is
> another process with the PID.
>
> Cheers Nico
>
>
> On 06.05.2011 23:08, Gary William Flake wrote:
>> Now trying 500 lines.
>> -- GWF
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 6, 2011, at 2:
Our team has a fork of the riaksearch source that we believe adds a very simple
but highly desirable improvement. We've reached out to Basho directly with the
idea but, as they say, code talks. The fork can be found at
https://github.com/gpascale/riak_search and we will be issuing a pull reque
I am building a backend for a web service and Riak looks to be a strong fit
for my needs at this point. However, there is one really simple requirement
that I can't figure out how to implement on Riak with any sort of
efficiency. To simplify the question, suppose that I want a twitter-like
servic
Per the advice from my earlier question (about retrieving records in a
particular sort order), I've been playing with Riak Search in an attempt to use
a range query over a numeric field to get the sort order that I want (or at
least the right range).
For the life of me, I can't get Riak Search
I can find no documentation anywhere for the desired format for date fields in
riak search.
I've looked at Lucene documentation thinking that it should be the same. From
there I can see that Lucene made a significant transition at some point with
respect to dates, but the documentation
http:/
ot;}
]}
2. Store dates as MMDDHHMMSS. Don't even think about adding '-' or ':' or
' ' anywhere in there, as it will split the tokens.
3. Then, query ranges in the same format as above will do what you think that
should.
-- GWF
On Jan 17,
I am sorry if this is not the appropriate place to send little observations
like this. I am just diving into Riak for the first time, and I think it is a
remarkable system, if not a bit frustrating as well.
Anyhow, here is the issue...
I can create an item in a bucket which has links according
I am using the python client api and in some of my runs python was crashing.
My gut reaction was that it was probably some untested corner case (I am doing
millions of insertions) or that the python client was buggy and that I would
eventually just switch over to another client need be.
But I
I am new to all of this myself, so caveat emptor. However, I think know of at
least two ways to do this.
The first is to use two different buckets, but with the same key universe. One
bucket is for the portion of the records that you want indexed, and the other
is for everything else. Depe
This is a really big pain point for me as well and -- at the risk of
prematurely being overly critical of Riak's overall design -- I think it
points to a major flaw of Riak in its current state.
Let me explain
Riak is bad at enumerating keys. We know that. I am happy to manage a list
of keys
I am using riak-js for connecting with riak from within node.
However, riak-js does not support any search APIs. I wrote a small
example in node.js to show how to hit the SOLR interface, which I've
shared with the developer of riak-js with the hope that he runs with
it. Nonetheless, some of you m
ve to hear some feedback. Docs updated at http://riakjs.org.
>
> For anyone interested in riak-js we now have a Twitter account: @riakjs.
>
> Francisco
>
>
> 2011/2/9 Gary William Flake :
>> I am using riak-js for connecting with riak from within node.
>> Ho
19 matches
Mail list logo
