I am guessing that in Cassandra that each user's mailbox has a single row
key and each message has a lexicographic or timestamp for a column key to
preserve order.
This can be emulated by using a bucket name as the row key, something like
"mailbox-{user-key}" for the bucket and the lexicographic k
David,
I ran the benchmark again for 9 hours overnight, just doing puts.
Performance fell steadily from 400 puts/s to 250 puts/s.
Graph: http://twitpic.com/9jtjmu/full
Cheers,
Tim.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:01 PM, David Smith wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
>
>
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
>
>
>
> With the adjusted ring size and settings, and adjusted to only do puts (so
> no missed reads), my cluster is doing about 400 puts per second:
> http://twitpic.com/9jnhlm/full
>
Actually, every put (put from a riak API level) does a read
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tim Haines wrote:
>
>
> I ran the benchmark again for 9 hours overnight, just doing puts.
> Performance fell steadily from 400 puts/s to 250 puts/s.
>
> Graph: http://twitpic.com/9jtjmu/full
>
>
1> Secs = 9 * 60 * 60.
32400
2> Secs * 400.
1296
Given your wri
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Ryan Zezeski wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> With the adjusted ring size and settings, and adjusted to only do puts
>> (so no missed reads), my cluster is doing about 400 puts per second:
>> http://twitpic.com/9jnhlm/f
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tim Haines wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Ryan Zezeski wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> With the adjusted ring size and settings, and adjusted to only do puts
>>> (so no missed reads), my cluste
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
>
> I guess I was hoping that someone could look at these results and say
> "Given the use case and the hardware, Riak should be performing 10x what
> you're seeing, so something is configured wrong." I'm not hearing that
> though. What I'm he
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Ryan Zezeski wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
>
>>
>> I guess I was hoping that someone could look at these results and say
>> "Given the use case and the hardware, Riak should be performing 10x what
>> you're seeing, so something
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Gregory Haskins
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working on an erlang client of the riak::search functionality built
> into riak-1.1.2. While I do see the support for querying data that is
> already indexed (rhc:search), I do not see how to index and/or remove data
> from
On May 11, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Ryan Zezeski wrote:
>
> The best way to use Search is for indexing KV data by installing the
> precommit hook. There are APIs to write docs that don't go through KV but
> IMO they never should have been added to Search and I plan to focus it on
> indexing KV data
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:09:36AM -0700, Ahmed Bashir wrote:
> Hey Andrew,
>
> Can you elaborate on how EDS replication does this mirroring? Does
> each vnode have the ability to connect to the other cluster, or is
> there a coordinator that sends data to the other cluster, etc?
There is a coor
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:35:06PM +, Elias Levy wrote:
> That's problematic. We will be rolling out an EDS implementation in the
> near future. One cluster will be in metal, but we are likely to place the
> other on EC2, and we'd use elastic IPs and split horizon DNS.
>
> When is this expec
12 matches
Mail list logo
