On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Ryan Zezeski <rzeze...@basho.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tim Haines <tmhai...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I guess I was hoping that someone could look at these results and say >> "Given the use case and the hardware, Riak should be performing 10x what >> you're seeing, so something is configured wrong." I'm not hearing that >> though. What I'm hearing is "Is that a realistic use case?". >> >> So given this use case, and the hardware I have, these are expected >> results? >> >> Tim. >> > > Yea, I don't want to come of as dodging the question. I've seen lots of > people run benchmarks for use cases they don't even have. That doesn't > seem to be the case here. > > Ryan, thanks. I appreciate your response. I'm waiting to hear back from John this morning to see if I can engage one of your consultants to answer the question for me. Tim.
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
