I am using the PHP library for a project and was looking through the code to
see what differentiates the Solr HTTP interface query versus the Lucene
search (besides the syntax and the interface, etc) as paging is very useful
for my code. From the PHP library with lucene I can do a search with lucen
Hi friends,
RiakSearch using the lucene analyzer (java) . In same logic can we use or
integrate the other lucene components to the riakSearch such as highlighter
etc. ?
RiakSearch calling outside java components to get benefit lucene current
analyzers.
Any plan on this ?
Pormetheus
__
> You need to parse the lastmodified time in the header like so:
>
> Date.parse(lastmodified)
>
> That method parses a date string into a unix int. I have a blog post about
> it on my blog somewhere.
This works wonderfully. Thanks so much for your help Alexander!
--
Alexander is correct, a full bucket query on any bucket will perform a list
keys across all keys in the cluster.
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
d...@basho.com
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Alexander Sicular wrote:
> Could we get some more clarification
Hi Guys,
Week ago I put data ready to index riaksearch via solr interface in the
rapidshare to make it available to community.
I would love to get some benchmark resuts from you guys. Is there anybody test
it ?
Prometheus..
___
riak-users maili
Hi,
I can't find the right format for dates in Riak Search, for fields
suffixed with "_dt". I tried rfc822 (e.g. "Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:02:59
-"), and xmlschema/iso8601 (e.g. "2010-11-04T16:07:43Z"), but I
get an {unhandled_type,date} error when requesting my data in JSON. No
problem with XML.
Hi,
Following the discussion with seancribbs and Tv on #riak:
http://pastie.org/private/acxekqyapbk7fz1hcp8udg
I only index documents with the bucket precommit hook and I do all my
searches via Map/Reduce queries.
I'm not sure how Search works, if there is an inverted index and a
forward index. I
Hi Joseph,
Answers inline below.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Joseph Lambert
wrote:
> I am using the PHP library for a project and was looking through the code
> to see what differentiates the Solr HTTP interface query versus the Lucene
> search (besides the syntax and the interface, etc) as
Hi Prometheus,
That is definitely something we'll consider for the future, but it's
currently not on the near-term roadmap.
Best,
Rusty
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Prometheus WillSurvive <
prometheus.willsurv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi friends,
>
> RiakSearch using the lucene analyzer (java)
Hi Nicolas,
Search stores a representation of the indexed object so that it knows what
to do later if you delete the object, change the object, or re-index the
object with a different analyzer. The representation allows us to delete the
old inverted index entries correctly.
We have considered add
Hi Nicolas,
Thank you for the excellent description of the problem. There are currently
issues/bugs around date support in Riak Search, looks like you found
another. I'd recommend treating dates as strings for now. The issue you
described is now tracked here: https://issues.basho.com/show_bug.cgi?
I monkey-patched Riak::Client::CurbBackend to get useful logs
https://gist.github.com/662986
Best,
Nicolas
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Rusty Klophaus wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> Thank you for the excellent description of the problem. There are currently
> issues/bugs around date support in Riak S
Thanks, I understand now. These two products are still a bit "separate".
Best,
Nicolas
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Rusty Klophaus wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> Search stores a representation of the indexed object so that it knows what
> to do later if you delete the object, change the object, or r
You know you can also do this:
client.http.send(:curl).verbose = true
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Nicolas Fouché wrote:
> I monkey-patched Riak::Client::CurbBackend to get useful logs
> https://gist.github.com/662986
>
Rusty,
Sorry, I meant Lucene search. Solr can be passed start and count, Lucene
search can't be, but they share functions in the Erlang code.
- Joe Lambert
joseph.g.lamb...@gmail.com
+86 13656213284
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Rusty Klophaus wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Answers inline below.
Disregard that last message. What I meant was, in a Solr query, all the
results are returned and then it sorts and then takes the chunk that is
requested by the start and count parameters. Why not instead make the
results of the search() function the input of a MapReduce job, and if the
user adds s
I haven't used your data, but I'm trying to benchmark riak search against
solr.
For my test, I'm using each paragraph in the english version of wikipedia as
a document as well as some sequential and random data in a couple of fields
to reflect our current usage (which is a CMS). That's about 22 mi
17 matches
Mail list logo
