Hi all,
I am testing Riak for my document base and i got a problem when i was
migrating documents from my previous
system to Riak.
I have two nodes and one bucket for the beginning.
There are more than 480 000 documents in the bucket and the documents
are html pages.
In the following you'll f
I got other informations when I launched "riak console" on the both
nodes, as you can see here.
I hope this will be useful for you and then for me :)
10.0.0.40:$ riak console
[...]
=INFO REPORT 5-May-2010::13:04:48 ===
Starting handoff of partition
479555224749202520035584085735030365824602
Germain,
It looks like you're filling up the dets tables -- which have a 2GB limit per
file, although Riak uses multiple files, one per vnode. Have you tried the
innostore backend? Also if you continue to use dets, try increasing the number
of partitions, which will make more, smaller files.
Morning, Afternoon, and Evening -
A few orphaned questions from IRC, a new PHP sample app, Riak.js
talking to Kiwi, and pointer a new Wiki feature for today's recap.
Enjoy -
Mark
--
Community Manager
wiki.basho.com
twitter.com/pharkmillups
--
Riak Recap for 5/4
1) Q --- The docs st
Riak Users,
You might have noticed that we released a new local key/value store
recently: http://blog.basho.com/2010/04/27/hello,-bitcask/
As of just now, it is available as a storage engine ("backend") in the
tip of the Riak repository.
You can use it like any other backend just by setting the
Hi,
As many of you know from twitter/irc I've put together a bare bones PHP client
for Bitcask:
http://github.com/videlalvaro/phpcask
If some guys/gals here think that this project might be helpful for someone
please let me know, so I can spend some more time on it.
To name an example where I
Great news! I am planning to try it out soon in development.
2010/5/5 Justin Sheehy :
> Riak Users,
>
> You might have noticed that we released a new local key/value store
> recently: http://blog.basho.com/2010/04/27/hello,-bitcask/
>
> As of just now, it is available as a storage engine ("backend
Sean,
I apologize if this is readily available in the docs, faq, etc. (I
obviously missed if it is).
When a cluster is repartitioned, e.g. as a result of adding or
removing vnodes, is one backend preferable to another? Does keeping
node size down help/hurt in terms of performance, reliability, et
We haven't often dealt with repartitioning clusters, which is why I
recommended a complete backup and restore. The behavior when trying to
dynamically change the partition quantity is undefined. Honestly I
don't know how the backend would affect it at all. As always, however,
adding nodes will incr
