Also, there are bugs in Riak Search 0.13 where field level schema settings
are not respected during a query, so you have to manually pad the numbers at
query time.
This is fixed in the upcoming 0.14 release.
Best,
Rusty
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Joseph Lambert
wrote:
> Make sure you chec
Make sure you check the padding of the number. I can no longer locate in the
wiki where it said you need to pad integer types, but as far as I remember
you need to pad the integer out to at least 10 digits. You should be able to
set a custom padding size like so:
{field, [ {name, "account"}, {type
Per the advice from my earlier question (about retrieving records in a
particular sort order), I've been playing with Riak Search in an attempt to use
a range query over a numeric field to get the sort order that I want (or at
least the right range).
For the life of me, I can't get Riak Search
