Re: riak deployment

2010-08-13 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Joyent makes a great service, but they are WAY overly priced. I'd recommend a 512 SliceHost/Linode. Or a 1GB @ Voxel/SoftLayer. -J On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Alexander Sicular wrote: > - You can not tell riak where to place buckets. > - You could set the N val on a bucket to one, and you

Re: riak deployment

2010-08-13 Thread Orlin Bozhinov
First of all, let's eliminate CouchDB. Its WOL filesystem is irrelevant for this is generated data. If a document gets lost (for whatever reason) - it can be regenerated. Topmost though, CouchDB can't run dynamic queries. That's what the field indexes are for. MongoDB is happy to store & q

Re: riak deployment

2010-08-12 Thread Alexander Sicular
- You can not tell riak where to place buckets. - You could set the N val on a bucket to one, and you should in the case of your 'big bucket'. Otherwise you will get N replicas on the same physical host. -Use linode. 512 > 256 = better. But in reality , your use case doesnt mesh well with what ri

riak deployment

2010-08-12 Thread Orlin Bozhinov
I can easily wait for Riak Search to do this http://groups.google.com/group/mongodb-user/browse_thread/thread/c2563a8566591a30/b3d19f21675a899e - instead of mongodb. Does this deployment I have in mind make sense: I'll get a medium (or large) Linode box for the big dataset bucket. Hopefully