The weekly recap was just posted with a slide decks on riak_core. Excellent
timing!
Is the Dynamo stuff in the riak-kv layer, then?
Or is it still used for "workload distribution" somehow in riak_core?
Or is the Dynamo storage concept not used "at all" in the riak_core?
Thanks!
-mox
On Wed, Ma
"Dynamo based apps" is what is throwing me; Dynamo is a storage paradigm.
So what your'e saying, really, is that riak_core is basically a clustering
configuration on top of OTP, and that Dynamo really doesn't have any play
here?
Wouldn't Dynamo be in the riak-kv layer?
-mox
On Wed, Mar 30, 201
Mike,
Riak (to be specific, riak-kv) it built atop riak-core. The Basho devs
recognized that a lot of the things that made riak-kv great were more
general than just key-value storage. This includes things like consistent
hashing, virtual nodes, hinted handoff, etc. They built riak-core as a
fou
Hi, Mike.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Mike Oxford wrote:
> I thought I understood Riak, then I ran across the fact that riak_core was
> split out separately.
> When would you use riak_core that you wouldn't use Riak?
Good question.
Riak Core is the distributed systems center that Riak is
