o:niravis...@yahoo.com>>; Luc Perkins
mailto:lperk...@basho.com>>
Cc: "riak-users@lists.basho.com<mailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com>"
mailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com>>
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Riak Search Production Configuration
Nira
o.com"
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Riak Search Production Configuration
Nirav, are you using CRDTs or plain old types with Riak? The definition for
field names makes a big difference in what gets archived and solr will not
complain if it couldn’t find match
m>>
To: Nirav Shah mailto:niravis...@yahoo.com>>
Cc: Shawn Debnath mailto:sh...@debnath.net>>;
"riak-users@lists.basho.com<mailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com>"
mailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com>>
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: Riak
.withSearchIndex("test_idx") .build();
riakClient.execute(sbp);
Regards,Nirav
From: Luc Perkins
To: Nirav Shah
Cc: Shawn Debnath ; "riak-users@lists.basho.com"
Sent: T
-
> *From:* Shawn Debnath
> *To:* Nirav Shah ; "riak-users@lists.basho.com" <
> riak-users@lists.basho.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 5, 2015 9:13 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Riak Search Production Configuration
>
> Hi Nirav,
>
> About your last point.
.basho.com"
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Riak Search Production Configuration
Hi Nirav,
About your last point. Just yesterday I started playing with Search 2.0 (solr)
and riak. Basho did a good job at integrating the solr platform but docs are
sometimes
Hi Nirav,
About your last point. Just yesterday I started playing with Search 2.0 (solr)
and riak. Basho did a good job at integrating the solr platform but docs are
sometimes misleading. One thing I found out was the using the default schema
provided by Basho, if you are using CRDTs, your fiel
