On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Tim Robinson wrote:
>
>
> I just read the Satebox page you linked as an example and have a hard time
> thinking I would want to use this. While automation is always nice, the
> overhead is an unnecessary burden. Since Clojure provides
> coordinated/transactional da
On 10/07/2011 04:23 PM, Tim Robinson wrote:
I just read the Satebox page you linked as an example and have a hard
time thinking I would want to use this. While automation is always nice,
the overhead is an unnecessary burden. Since Clojure provides
coordinated/transactional data structures, it's
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Tim Robinson wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Thanks for the response and the history (which is always the hardest part
> in understanding a current state).
>
> Here are some thoughts/response to your write up:
>
> > Let me know why not, please
>
> I think you misread my s
Hi Tim,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tim Robinson wrote:
[snip]
>
> 2. Are there any known plans for a Riak cloud service? I know about Joyent,
> but frankly I don't like their business model and can't see using them. Just
> curious if there's anything in the works.
>
> Note: as a preemptiv
Hi Russell,
Thanks for the response and the history (which is always the hardest
part in understanding a current state).
Here are some thoughts/response to your write up:
> Let me know why not, please
I think you misread my statement here, as I said I do believe I can
use it.
> [link...] give
Hi Tim,
On 7 Oct 2011, at 22:45, Tim Robinson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been slowly learning & evaluating Riak for a product I am developing.
> Originally I gave Riak a whirl about 6 months back, but stopped due to some
> missing features. With the recent release of 1.0 I've decided to giv
