Sorry it's David...not Dave...:)
On 29 April 2010 00:32, Abeming Sf wrote:
> Hi Dave and wde,
>
> Thanks for ur explanation, it helps me to decide which storage backend
> should I use. Appreciate that.
>
> Regards,
> Abe
>
>
> On 28 April 2010 20:48, David Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi Abe,
>>
>> On Mon
Hi Dave and wde,
Thanks for ur explanation, it helps me to decide which storage backend
should I use. Appreciate that.
Regards,
Abe
On 28 April 2010 20:48, David Smith wrote:
> Hi Abe,
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Abeming Sf wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Data example : [{field, "value"},
Hi Abe,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Abeming Sf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Data example : [{field, "value"}, {field, "value"}, {field, "value"}]
>
First observation -- that's only ~61 bytes of data when encoded into binary
-- which is pretty small. If you start storing larger chunks of data (say
10
I never used innostore, but dets seems to be a good solution if you don't have
to store more than 2Gb in one file :)
>Hi,
>
>I did some testing between dets and innostore for storage backend which
>store 200k of data with same structure. Using default configuration for both
>storage backend, run
