> On Jan 21, 2015, at 4:43 PM, José Ghislain Quenum
> wrote:
>
> great!
> thanks a bunch
> José
Anytime.
- Chris
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
great!
thanks a bunch
José
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn <
cmeiklej...@basho.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21, 2015, at 4:41 PM, José Ghislain Quenum <
> jose.que...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > thanks again for your clarifications and pointers. I will take a look at
> them
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 4:41 PM, José Ghislain Quenum
> wrote:
>
> thanks again for your clarifications and pointers. I will take a look at
> them. There is just one point that you left out. Will there still be the
> links entry in the object meta so that I can store links and walk them
> manu
thanks again for your clarifications and pointers. I will take a look at
them. There is just one point that you left out. Will there still be the
links entry in the object meta so that I can store links and walk them
manually (using MR)? Or will this functionality completely disappear with
link wal
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:23 PM, José Ghislain Quenum
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Chris for your email. MR is the way I do my link walking actually.
> However, I was assuming that the links entry in the meta part of an object
> was going to disappear. Please correct me on that if I am wrong. Otherwise
Thanks Chris for your email. MR is the way I do my link walking actually.
However, I was assuming that the links entry in the meta part of an object
was going to disappear. Please correct me on that if I am wrong. Otherwise
I should be just fine then.
On the other hand I did consider using the new
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 12:21 PM, José Ghislain Quenum
> wrote:
>
> well the application I am developing is Collaboration support tool. You have
> a bunch of concepts (organization, project, collaboration activities, events,
> etc). Some of these concepts are connected. So, I could have modeled
well the application I am developing is Collaboration support tool. You
have a bunch of concepts (organization, project, collaboration activities,
events, etc). Some of these concepts are connected. So, I could have
modeled them with a Relational DB. But I really wanted to take advantage of
Riak's
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:07 PM, José Ghislain Quenum
wrote:
> Then,
> where can one find pointers or documentation about alternative design to
> link walking?
Hi Jose,
I personally like to think of link walking as one solution that could
be used to solve many different problems. Can you clari
Then,
where can one find pointers or documentation about alternative design to
link walking?
Regards,
José
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Cosmin Marginean
wrote:
> Thank you Brian!
>
> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 17:45, Brian Roach wrote:
>
> Cosmin -
>
> Link walking is deprecated as of R
Thank you Brian!
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 17:45, Brian Roach wrote:
> Cosmin -
>
> Link walking is deprecated as of Riak 2.0 and will be removed in a
> future version.
>
> As to whether something similar will replace it, as of now I do not
> believe we have anything on the roadmap, no.
Cosmin -
Link walking is deprecated as of Riak 2.0 and will be removed in a
future version.
As to whether something similar will replace it, as of now I do not
believe we have anything on the roadmap, no.
Thanks,
- Roach
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Cosmin Marginean wrote:
> (Apologies
(Apologies if this is a recurring topic, but I haven’t read a clear statement
yet in relation to this)
Using Riak, I sometimes feel that link walking might be a corner stone for
certain data modelling techniques. The Riak documentation though states clearly
that this is not feasible while also
13 matches
Mail list logo
