Then, where can one find pointers or documentation about alternative design to link walking? Regards, José
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Cosmin Marginean <cosmin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Brian! > > On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 17:45, Brian Roach wrote: > > Cosmin - > > Link walking is deprecated as of Riak 2.0 and will be removed in a > future version. > > As to whether something similar will replace it, as of now I do not > believe we have anything on the roadmap, no. > > Thanks, > - Roach > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Cosmin Marginean <cosmin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > (Apologies if this is a recurring topic, but I haven’t read a clear > statement yet in relation to this) > > Using Riak, I sometimes feel that link walking might be a corner stone for > certain data modelling techniques. The Riak documentation though states > clearly that this is not feasible while also enabling security (another > cornerstone for certain business cases): > http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/running/authz/ > > I was wondering if there’s any plans to retire link walking and replaces it > with something else (that *is* compatible with the security design) or if > there are alternatives that could help fill this gap. > > Thanks in advance > Cos > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
