secondary indexes instead of
> extra documents. I think it's cleaner conceptually, and it's a simpler
> implementation.
>
> On 2/21/12 2:46 PM, David Dawson wrote:
>>
>> This looks great
>>
>> Although I am still not clear when to use index's and when n
This looks great
Although I am still not clear when to use index's and when not to, for instance
if I wanted to build a high speed backend system where you could look up a user
either by their email address or their mobile number I see 2 ways to do this:
1 .Create a user document, follo
P
On 27 Aug 2011, at 00:38, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Afternoon, Evening, Morning to All -
>
> Here's a great Recap to take you into the weekend: blog posts, slides,
> videos, new code, and more.
>
> Also, to all our Riak users who happen to be on the East Coast of the
> US this weekend: stay
secondary
> vnodes as a group and use a leader election algorithm to always ensure
> a single vnode is the leader at any point -- and only send request to
> that leader. The existing gen_leader module you can find online may
> fit this bill.
>
> -Joe
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011
I have a quick question regarding riak_core:
Basically I am trying to build an application on top of riak_core that
allows me to spawn a session per user interaction, so I can both hold state and
queue requests to ensure ( as best I can ) that a user will only be interacting
with my sys
Mark,
I would be really interested in how to use riak_core's handoff callbacks..
I also found bashobanjo to be really helpful, so maybe extending that to
utilise the extra feature that riak_core offers, accompanied with a short
tutorial would also provide good material.
Dave
On 5 Apr 2011,
.cloudharmony.com/2010/09/benchmarking-of-ec2s-new-cluster.html
> [3] http://blog.cloudharmony.com/2010/06/disk-io-benchmarking-in-cloud.html
> [4]
> http://blog.bioteam.net/2010/07/boot-ephemeral-ebs-storage-performance-on-amazon-cc1-4xlarge-instance-types/
> [5]
> http://blog.bio
I am not sure if this has already been discussed, but I am looking at the
feasibility of running RIAK in a EC2 cloud, as we have a requirement that may
require us to scale up and down quite considerably on a month by month basis.
After some initial testing and investigation we have come to the c
I am not sure if this is any help but I have uploaded a protocol buffer pool
client for riak which requires you to pass a client_id for each operation.
https://github.com/DangerDawson/riakc_pb_pool
It is very very basic, but does most of the useful things:
- put / get / delete
-
he number of scheduler threads to create (usually 1 thread per CPU)
> +sct - specify the CPU topology (useful for NUMA processors like Nehalem)
>
> Sean Cribbs
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> http://basho.com/
>
> On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:40 AM, David Daws
ork
> and disk (and possibly RAM) to be the primary limiting factors.
>
> Sean Cribbs
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> http://basho.com/
>
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:36 PM, David Dawson wrote:
>
>> We are currently running a ring of 3 machines each machin
We are currently running a ring of 3 machines each machine with 12 cores, and
have noticed that we seem to only be using 60% of available CPU ( other 40% is
spent idle ) when running basho bench against the cluster. We have tried
changing the 'n_val' from 3 to 1 and also the backend from bitcask
; reverse proxy, etc)?
> 3) Can you enable "verbose" mode on curl and paste the output? Here's how:
>
> client.http.send(:curl).verbose = true
>
> Sean Cribbs
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> http://basho.com/
>
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 11
I am currently doing some benchmarking with the current ripple library and have
noticed that a 'PUT' ( on mac os x ) is taking over 1 sec when using the curb
library!
If I force the riak-client to use net http instead then the same 'PUT' takes
less than 20 ms
For now we are going to disable t
14 matches
Mail list logo
