Thanks Bryan, I ended up building from source.
Andrew
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Bryan Hunt wrote:
> Short of running virtual machines, or docker instances this is not
> currently possible.
> On 11 Nov 2014 22:01, "Andrew Zeneski" wrote:
>
>> I have a cl
I have a cluster of RHEL 6 test servers currently running 1.4.10. I'd like
to install 2.0.2 on these servers along side of 1.4.10, without building
from source. I need the ability to switch between both while testing our
application with the latest Riak. Both versions do not need to be running
at t
;: "x", "value": 5}} ] }
Would the default extractor flatten this to :
stats.stat1.name = stat1, stats.stat1.group = x, stats.stat1.value = 1
stats.stat2.name = stat2, stats.stat2.group = x, stats.stat2.value = 5
As far as indexing is concerned, would this be the same as {&qu
> -Alexander
>
> @siculars
> http://siculars.posthaven.com
>
> Sent from my iRotaryPhone
>
> On Oct 26, 2014, at 10:43, Andrew Zeneski
> wrote:
>
> Yes right, I was tired when I typed this; stats should be an array:
>
> {"id": 1, "stats": [{
And the query would be something like
>
> Stats_name = stat1 and stats_value > 1
>
> I think the extractor flattens everything and separates with underscores.
>
> -Alexander
>
> @siculars
> http://siculars.posthaven.com
>
> Sent from my iRotaryPhone
>
Hi All, I'm trying to determine if a use case is supported by Yokozuna or
not.
With a stored value that looks like:
{"id": 1, "stats": { "name": "stat1", "value": 1 }, {"name": "stat2",
"value": 5}}
{"id": 2, "stats": { "name": "stat3", "value": 2 }, {"name": "stat1",
"value": 3}}
{"id": 3, "sta
:
>
> On Jul 24, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Andrew Zeneski
> wrote:
>
> Been checking out 2.0rc1 and am really excited about the new features (as
> I think most of us are). I had a couple of questions that I couldn't find
> answers to scanning the docs. Totally possible I missed i
Been checking out 2.0rc1 and am really excited about the new features (as I
think most of us are). I had a couple of questions that I couldn't find
answers to scanning the docs. Totally possible I missed it and if so,
please feel free to direct me to the proper place.
1. Is there a way to remove a
rate
> more results:
>
>
> https://github.com/basho/riak_search/blob/develop/src/riak_search_op_utils.erl#L174
>
> This could happen if another node involved in this operation became
> unavailable (due to network segmentation, a crash, administrative stop)
>
>
> Regards,
> C
I'm seeing this in my crash log, can anyone help me understand what it
means?
2014-07-17 17:21:20 =ERROR REPORT
Error in process <0.11353.4454> on node 'riak@x.x.x.x' with exit value:
{{nocatch,stream_timeout},[{riak_search_op_utils,gather_stream_results,4,[{file,"src/riak_search_op_utils.erl"
pload and I didn't notice it. Sorry, it will be fixed shortly. -Jared
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Andrew Zeneski
wrote: No more OS X builds? On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Tom Santero
wrote: Hello Riak Users, The Basho Team is happy to
release Riak 2.0.0-beta1. The source t
No more OS X builds?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Tom Santero wrote:
> Hello Riak Users,
>
> The Basho Team is happy to release Riak 2.0.0-beta1. The source tarball
> and pre-built packages are available for download [0]. Note that we've
> added support for FreeBSD 10, and removed support
I am seeing an error when the search pre-commit hook runs on Linux (RHEL 6, RPM
install)
{hook_crashed,
{riak_search_kv_hook,precommit,error,
{badmatch,...
On OS X 10.8 (running the downloaded tarball) the exact same process works
fine, as it did with 1.2.
Trying to determ
Sean,
One thing I have been meaning to ask is if we can change the character used
when flattening the fields. I'd like to use a character besides _ so that I can
identify the parent from a field that has _ in its name. I would probably
change it to '.' personally.
Is this configurable?
Andrew
I was told R15B1
Andrew
On Jul 13, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Jeremy Ong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looks awesome, which Erlang release is the recommended one for building this?
>
> jeremy
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Gordon Tillman wrote:
> Jared this is great news. There are some supremely-useful ad
Sean,
Doesn't enabling search on a bucket mean setting properties? At least the
precommit hook property right?
Andrew
On Jul 10, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Wu,
>
> As long as you are not setting properties on those buckets, there are very
> few reasons why performance would be
That should have been 14.5KB not MB.
Andrew
On Jul 5, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
>
> I am seeing some odd behavior from the PBC Search API. When the search
> results get to be a certain size and the size changes depending on the
> client's location (over GB et
I am seeing some odd behavior from the PBC Search API. When the search results
get to be a certain size and the size changes depending on the client's
location (over GB ethernet its around 14.5MB when I VPN in it appears to be
much less; but I'll confirm that later) the returned byte array cons
When I pass (using PBC API) a w n_val of 4294967294 (4294967295 - 1) to tell
riak to only require 1 replica to respond successful for a write I get back
error code 1 {n_val_violation,3}.
However, if I pass in the integer value 1 instead of the special value it
works. Did I misunderstand the mea
29, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Andrew Zeneski
> wrote:
> https://github.com/basho/riak_search/issues/118
>
> On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Thanks for the d
n issue on the issue tracker in the meantime? Here's the link:
> https://github.com/basho/riak_search/issues
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Andrew Zeneski
> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> What I am doing is very simple:
>
> 1. I install the precommit hook on my test b
Sean,
What I am doing is very simple:
1. I install the precommit hook on my test bucket (bin/search-cmd install test)
2. I create a JSON object that looks like this {"name": "Andrew Zeneski"} and
store it in Riak (using my API and the key "1000")
3. I create a
; On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Andrew Zeneski
> wrote:
> I built the 1.2.0pre3 (and master) and now have secondary index lookups
> working in my client api; I am testing search right now but getting errors;
> is RpbSearchQueryReq (PBC) implemented in 1.2?
>
> Thanks
I built the 1.2.0pre3 (and master) and now have secondary index lookups working
in my client api; I am testing search right now but getting errors; is
RpbSearchQueryReq (PBC) implemented in 1.2?
Thanks!
Andrew
On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
> Thanks Sean,
>
&g
ent application, be aware that they may not be
> supported on the server yet (in fact, 1.1 and earlier will likely dump the
> connection).
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Andrew Zeneski
> wrote:
> I am working on a new protocol buffer based client using the master riak_pb
I am working on a new protocol buffer based client using the master riak_pb
repository. I would just like to inquire on the state of riak_kv with the
latest pb, specifically is RpbIndexReq and RpbSearchQueryReq implemented yet (I
know it is not in 1.1.4), if not is there a road map or any idea w
26 matches
Mail list logo
