It is sad to see Basho dying, but good to see that there is hope that Riak will
survive. Being an open source database was very important for academics to
experiment and propose solutions. Not everything makes sense in an actual
product, but the Riak developers and architects were always keen t
Lloyd, I too have a great distaste for the cost of those things.
I don't believe that's how developers should be forced to climb the
ladder for knowledge.
Nor do I believe developers should be pushed to create most of the
content for those conferences just to be able to afford attending.
I defini
Hi Steve,
Many thanks for your informative and comforting post. The program you're
contemplating sounds sensible and, indeed, promising.
Successful implementation and operation of Riak among enterprise users is in
everyone's interest. Erlang Solutions has an excellent track record in support
Riak was and still is a good platform, with the potential to be a
great platform.
I am fairly sure I am not the only one whose staked their reputation
on it.. The name is unimportant.
The question now is where is the focus going to be put next?
To ferret away whatever existing possibly panicking
Hi All
Great to see there is so much enthusiasm for Riak.
I'm from Erlang Solutions. Just to clarify where things are at the
moment. The company Basho Technologies still exists - it hasn't filed
for bankruptcy yet - although we expect it to. There is no grave just
yet. We are creditors and s
Hi there,
As Riak's future is uncertain and despite I love it as it covers everything
I was needing, I'm on the look for another NoSQL DB that replaces it for my
project. What are your suggestions? Some of my requirements (Riak features)
would be:
1. Master-less (all nodes can read/write)
2. Sche
On 15 Jul 2017, at 01:29, Alexander Sicular wrote:
> I'm not dancing on anyone's grave. Im a big fan of Riak, you know? I'm just
> pointing out that there is in fact a grave and if there is any hope for a
> Riak future the project will have to rebrand.
This is the thing we disagree on. But l
