I added logging into the resolvers to see how frequently I am received
siblings, and how many I get when its called.
Almost every call has only two siblings, and, although I am definitely creating
them, about 10 or so per minute, it seems to be handling that ok. Its not a
perfect test though a
I've been looking through the changes to the RiakClient class - and have a
question about the nodes list and RiakNode/Decaying class.
It seems that the Decaying class is used internally to track error_rates
(request failure_rate?) of nodes in the available pool.
In the application I maintain, we'
I'm currently using the java client and its ConflictResolver and Mutator
interfaces. In some cases I am just doing a store, and letting the client do
an implicit fetch and the mutator to make the actual change. In other cases
I'm doing an explicit fetch, modify the result, and then a store wit
On the client you could extract the value_count of the objects you
read and just log them. Feel free to post code too, in particular, how
you are writing out updated values.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Paul Ingalls wrote:
> Interesting. I have sibling resolution code on the client side. Wou
Interesting. I have sibling resolution code on the client side. Would sibling
explosion take out the entire cluster all at once? Within 5 minutes of my last
email, the rest of the cluster died.
Is there a way to quickly figure out whether the cluster is full of siblings?
Paul Ingalls
Founder
Given your leveldb settings, I think that compaction is an unlikely
culprit. But check this out:
2013-08-05 18:01:15.878 [info] <0.83.0>@riak_core_sysmon_
handler:handle_event:92 monitor large_heap <0.14832.557>
[{initial_call,{riak_kv_get_fsm,init,1}},{almost_current_function,{riak_object,encode
Yes, that page went out before I had a chance to review it. I'll try to get
the installation instructions patched this week.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Matt Black wrote:
> Ah okay, thanks Sean.
>
> The reason I went down that road is that the docs say you need v2.5:
>
> http://docs.basho.co
Ah okay, thanks Sean.
The reason I went down that road is that the docs say you need v2.5:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/taste-of-riak/python/
On 31 July 2013 23:05, Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Matt,
>
> For compatibility reasons, we use 2.4.1, which is pinned in the
> requirements of the ri
I watched top on all the instances when things started to fall apart. This is
what I saw…
Everything was jamming along just fine. CPU usage was about 25%, ram usage was
about 25% (3 of the 7 were at about 15%).
Suddenly, CPU usage spikes to over 50% and ram usage spikes to 80-90% (and I'm
gu
Hey Kresten,
Thanks for the response!
I learned my lesson on setting bucket properties. So all buckets currently use
the defaults.
here is the output from one of our nodes:
total 40
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 5 21:10 ./
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Aug 4 17:26 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 root ro
Hope you all don't get pissed for me spamming the list….;)
I upgraded my cluster to 1.4.1 in hopes the levelDB changes may help. The
cluster is now up and running, however Riak Control is complaining:
The following nodes are currently incompatible with Riak Control:
I googled around and saw t
I'd think the large #buckets could be the issue; especially if there is any
bucket properties being set, because that would cause the ring data structure
to be enormous.
Could you provide an "ls -l" output of the riak data/ring directory?
Sent from my iPhone
On 05/08/2013, at 21.52, "Paul Inga
Looks like I had to run make distclean BEFORE checking out the 1.4.1 tag...
Paul Ingalls
Founder & CEO Fanzo
p...@fanzo.me
@paulingalls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulingalls
On Aug 5, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Chris Meiklejohn wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Can you confirm that everything was removed from /
Hi Paul,
Can you confirm that everything was removed from /home/fanzo/riak/deps
after running make distclean? It appears that there's an older riak_kv
still hanging around there. Sometimes rebar delete-deps, which is what is
triggered by distclean, fails to clean up dependencies when they have b
When I try to checkout the tag to build the source, and then run make rel I get
the following error:
ERROR: Dependency dir /home/fanzo/riak/deps/riak_kv failed application
validation with reason:
{version_mismatch,{"/home/fanzo/riak/deps/riak_kv/src/riak_kv.app.src",
{expected
Correct link to the release notes [1].
Apologies.
[1] https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.4/RELEASE-NOTES.md
- Chris
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn <
cmeiklej...@basho.com> wrote:
> Riak Users,
>
> We are pleased to announce a bugfix release on the Riak 1.4 series
>
Riak Users,
We are pleased to announce a bugfix release on the Riak 1.4 series addressing
issues with Riak Control, Secondary Indexes and LevelDB.
The release notes for Riak can be found here:
https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.4/RE LEASE-NOTES.md
The packages can be found here: http://docs.
As promised in previous email, I hit a fairly big problem over the weekend and
then reproduced it this morning and I was wondering if I could get some help.
Basically, I was running my code against our risk cluster and everything was
moving along just fine. However, at some point Riak just seem
Hello all,
Is there any way to determine progress/percent complete?
This has been running for 3 days now. I figured it would finish over the
weekend but it hasn't.
# riak-admin restore riak@ riak
/var/lib/riak/backups/all_nodes.20130725.bak
Restoring from '/var/lib/riak/backups/all_nodes.2013072
Riak Users,
The eighth release of Yokozuna is out. It is now considered alpha and will
soon become part of Riak proper. There could still be breaking
changes leading up to the 1.0.0 release which is currently scheduled
for early October.
The main things of interest this release are the re-targe
Hi everyone,
We wanted to single out two RICON announcements:
## RICON code contest
We're putting up *five free* tickets to RICON West. If you want one,
here's what you need to do:
- Write a sample app leveraging either Counters or Yokozuna
- Write a packaging/deployment tool with BOSH or Packe
Keep in mind that, apart from custom settings, buckets are just a prefix on
keys, so you could create your own "buckets" by just adding the strings
directly to your keys.
Your current solution is effectively doing that, but keep that option in mind
if you decide you need another 50k buckets wit
We are creating a lot of buckets because I needed the extra namespace. My
alternative was constantly updating a value, which in some cases would grow the
value very large. I figured keeping the key/value groups small would be quite
a bit faster, and since the docs said you could have as many b
G'day!
Nearly every day since upgrading to Riak 1.3.1 I've been seeing the
following errors on random nodes:
2013-08-05 01:00:05.775 [error] <0.212.0> Supervisor
riak_pipe_fitting_sup had child undefined started with
riak_pipe_fitting:start_link() at <0.26698.882> exit with reason noproc
in
Before I'd done the research, I too thought that the overheads were a
much lower, near to what the calculator said, but not too far off.
There are a few things that I plan on addressing this release cycle:
- 16b per-allocation overhead from using enif_alloc. This allows us
a lot of flexibility
Evan,
News about per key overhead of 91 bytes are quite frustrating. When we were
choosing a key value storage per key metadata size was a crucial point for
us. We have a simple use case but a lot of data (hundreds of millions of
items) so we were looking for the ways to reduce memory consumption.
26 matches
Mail list logo
