I prefer second option since it will show are the corrupted blocks related
to race condition. First option needs to be run for a long time to be
completely sure that it really fixes the issue.
2013/7/26 Matthew Von-Maszewski
> Vladimir,
>
> I apologize for not recognizing your name and previous
Hi Kathleen,
Sorry if I missed this, but is the cluster currently up?
Also, out of curiosity, are you running Riak Control?
Mark
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:03 AM, kzhang wrote:
> I upgraded the riak clustered with 5 nodes. Unfortunately, after I upgraded
> the first node, the other four nodes a
Vladimir,
I apologize for not recognizing your name and previous contribution. I just
tend to think in terms of code and performance bottlenecks, not people.
Your June contribution resulted in changes that were released in 1.4 and 1.3.2.
I and the team thank you. However, we have not isolate
Good. Will wait for doctor.
A month ago I mailed about segmentation fault
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2013-June/012245.html
After looking at core dumps you have found this problem with CRC checks
being skipped. I enabled paranoid_checks and got my node up an running
Vladimir,
I can explain what happened, but not how to correct the problem. The gentleman
that can walk you through a repair is tied up on another project, but he
intends to respond as soon as he is able.
We recently discovered / realized that Google's leveldb code does not check the
CRC of ea
Hi Brian,
We have a custom (and very small) admin page that shows Riak KV version,
connected nodes and ring members, here is how it looks:
riak_kv_version 1.4.0
connected_nodes riak@node2
riak@node3
riak@node4
riak@node5
ring_membersriak@node1
riak@node2
riak@node3
riak@nod
Guido -
Right now, no.
We've been having some internal discussions around that topic and
whether it's really a "client library" operation or not.
How are you using stats? Is it for a monitoring app or ... ?
Thanks,
Brian Roach
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Guido Medina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is
On 07/22/2013 07:52 PM, Siraaj Khandkar wrote:
On 07/22/2013 10:29 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
You should be doing a GET before the PUT with the deletedvclock option.
Here is an example I used to originally test (and fix) this bug:
https://gist.github.com/Vagabond/965376#file-delete_bug-erl-L48
Just one caveat on stanchion clustering -- I would say it is technically
possible to do so with some of the linux clustering tools, but we have no
official guides or support for such a configuration.
- James
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:56 AM, John Daily wrote:
> Good questions, Andre, thanks fo
Good questions, Andre, thanks for reaching out.
> How is the Scaling of Raik CS when setting up a few hundred servers in a
> cluster?
The upper limit of a cluster size depends on traffic load, hardware, and
network capacity, but anything approaching 100 servers is likely to run into
trouble du
http://basho.github.io/riak-java-client/1.4.0/com/basho/riak/client/raw/config/ClusterConfig.html#addClient(T)
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:02 AM, kiran kulkarni wrote:
> Thanks, This work if port is same for all hosts. My usecase is a bit
> different:
> Actually for development, I run 4 Riak instan
Hi,
Although I haven't finished the write up for GC, here is the RFC for CRDTs in
Riak https://github.com/basho/riak/issues/354
Please let me know what you think on the Github issue.
Many thanks
Russell
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.bas
It seems to be RFC season!
In an effort to make clients easier to configure and connect to Riak,
here's a feature I'm working on for the next version of Riak. I invite your
comments on the Github issue: https://github.com/basho/riak/issues/356
--
Sean Cribbs
Software Engineer
Basho Technologies
Thanks, This work if port is same for all hosts. My usecase is a bit
different:
Actually for development, I run 4 Riak instances locally with different
ports 10017, 10027, 10037, 10047 for PB.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Brian Roach wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:47 AM, kiran kulkarni
How is the Scaling of Raik CS when setting up a few hundred servers in a
cluster?
Does it make sense, to build a cluster of that size, or is it recommended
to have smaller pools of clusters and shard the Files over more than one
cluster? What about stanchion as the potetial single point of failure
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:47 AM, kiran kulkarni wrote:
> Class PBClusterConfig has only method addHosts which allows to set hosts
> only. I am using a different port for PB connections. How do I set host and
> port both?
http://basho.github.io/riak-java-client/1.4.0/com/basho/riak/client/raw/pbc/
Fixed. Apparently I updated the ACL for 1.1.2 and not 1.4.0, sorry.
Thanks,
- Roach
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:53 PM, YN wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thanks for putting the release together so quickly. It does not appear as
> though the download is working (for the non maven files). It looks like
> the
Hello,
In following Cluster Client example, it is assumed that I use default PB
port (8087) on riak.
https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/wiki/ClientFactory#http-or-pb-cluster-client
Class *PBClusterConfig* has only method *addHosts *which allows to set
hosts only. I am using a different po
I upgraded the riak clustered with 5 nodes. Unfortunately, after I upgraded
the first node, the other four nodes all went down. I am not sure what
caused the downtime. There was a erl_crash.dump on all five, with similar
content:
=erl_crash_dump:0.1
Wed Jul 24 11:37:56 2013
Slogan: Kernel pid term
Hi,
During a test I just performed on a small Riak 1.4 cluster setup on Azure,
I started seeing the Riak errors messages listed below after about 10
minutes.
The simple test was performed using lastest Jmeter running on two Azure
instances,
which also each runs haproxy and loadbalances the http/r
Hi Dave,
Thanks for pointing out the settings for disabling Nagle.
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Tweaking-app-config-and-vm-args-for-best-performance-tp4028510p4028546.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Hi,
Is there a way to get the JSON stats via PBC? This is how we are doing
it now, we would like to get rid of any HTTP call, currently, this is
the only call being made to HTTP:
/private void collectNodeInfo(final PBClientConfig clientConfig)//
// {//
//...//
//RiakClusterStats stat
22 matches
Mail list logo
