Morning, Afternoon, Evening To All -
Here's a Recap for the last week or so: meetups, code, slides, and more.
Enjoy, and thanks for being a part of Riak.
Mark
twitter.com/pharkmillups
Riak Recap for November 6 - 14
1) Telefonica is
Thanks Mark.
Eagerly waiting for riak 1.3
Venkatesh
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi Venki,
>
> I know this email is about two months late, but I figured it was worth
> responding to as I've had this response as a draft for the last 60 or
> days or so. :)
>
> At
I've quieted down most other Riak traffic on this system, and we still get this
crashy behavior even under light load. Right now, it's 100% reproducible that
if I run 'kv.bucket("ctv_tvdata").get_keys()' on this host, Riak logs hundreds
of errors about leveldb workers crashing.
We don't see lev
See:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/tutorials/choosing-a-backend/LevelDB/
Look for the section titled "Parameter Planning". It has the best content.
Keep in mind that leveldb maps most of its files into memory. So the RSS
(resident set size) is BOTH the memory you allocate via parameters a
Hi Matthew,
I would like to understand these leveldb stalls, for sure. However, I wonder if
they are a separate issue? I've been sitting here with a live tail of all the
leveldb LOG files, along with the riak console log tailing side by side. And
I've seen three periods whereby we get hundreds
The 512 vnodes will run on 5 physical nodes in production, but we're running
all 512 on a single node in dev. And it's on one of these single node
"clusters" that we're seeing these issues.
Dave
--
Dave Lowell
d...@connectv.com
On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Matthew Von-Maszewski wrote:
> Dave,
Dave,
The problem seems most pronounced when your are averaging 6 megabyte values.
Honestly, my previous test suite only included 150k values. The WriteThrottle
is NOT giving you the support you need in this situation (you need it to be
throttling a tad more). I need to think on how to help
Thanks Matthew. Yep, there are quite a few hits on 'waiting'. Interesting. I'll
send the merged log separately.
Dave
--
Dave Lowell
d...@connectv.com
On Nov 14, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Matthew Von-Maszewski wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Ok, heavy writes. Let's see if leveldb has hit one of its intentional
What major factors drive memory usage in Riak? As users of Riak 1.2.1 with
eleveldb back-end, I had figured that the dominant source of memory use would
be the eleveldb cache. However, we're using the default 8 MB of cache per
vnode, which would therefore max out at 4 GB of cache for our 512 vno
Dave,
Ok, heavy writes. Let's see if leveldb has hit one of its intentional "stalls":
> sort /var/db/riak/leveldb/*/LOG* | grep -i waiting
See if that shows any indication of stall in the LOG files of leveldb. If so,
pick one server and send me a combined LOG file from that server:
sort /var
Thanks Matthew. I've run both greps with no hits, unfortunately.
A couple of details that I want to highlight. Since I first posted about this
issue, we upgraded from Riak 1.2.0, to 1.2.1. Following that upgrade, we
continue see these periods of instability with errors in the logs like
"riak_k
Hi Scott,
To further add to this conversation, the key is removed immediately when
there is a get request on that expired key, as you indicated in the email.
Pavan
On 11/13/12 7:38 AM, "Sean Cribbs" wrote:
>Hi again Scott,
>
>Expired keys in bitcask will be removed from disk when
>compaction/m
Hi,
since we upgraded our riak cluster from 0.14 to 1.2, we see MapReduce
queries failing while any of the nodes is starting but not yet ready
(that is while the 'Waiting for service riak_kv' message still appears
in the logs).
This is quite problematic, since it takes almost 50 minutes for t
Dave,
Just getting my head back into the game. Was away for a few days. Random
thought, maybe there is a hard drive with a read problem. That can cause
issues similar to this. 1.2.1 does NOT percolate the read errors seen in
leveldb to riak-admin (yes, that should start to happen in 1.3).
>
> Hmm. Thanks for the extensive info. We're looking into this. Give us a few
> hours to do some theorizing. You'll hear from us tomorrow unless another
> enterprising list member has thoughts here.
>
Was there any update to this?
We had the exact same issue with one of the nodes in our 35
I'd still be interested in an answer from the Basho folk regarding the
product questions. Putting to one side the "how" for now, *should* Riak be
able to satisfy any or all those three scenarios?
Regards,
Martin.
On 13 November 2012 23:34, Shane McEwan wrote:
> G'day Tom and Matt. Thanks for yo
16 matches
Mail list logo