And there is always this:
http://wiki.basho.com/Rolling-Upgrades.html
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> We verify rolling upgrades from two releases back. You are safe to proceed in
> the rolling upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2.
>
> Sean Cribbs
>
> On Sep 11, 2012, at 7
Hi Matt,
We verify rolling upgrades from two releases back. You are safe to proceed in
the rolling upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2.
Sean Cribbs
On Sep 11, 2012, at 7:56 PM, Matt Black wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm going to be doing our first full-cluster upgrade in production soon. The
> docs suggest
Matt,
We copied all the data key by key, since we used incorrect
'ring_creation_size' value.
(
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Cluster-migration-due-to-incorrect-quot-ring-creation-size-quot-value-td4024509.html
)
So, you can use this copy tool - https://github.com/tovbinm/riak-tools,
whic
Simply copying the riak/data and riak/etc directories should do the trick. You
can use tar, rsync or simply cp as you feel like, and you can do all that while
Riak is running at full throttle. The beauty of log structured storage
(Bitcask, LevelDB, HainoiDB)
At least that's the idea. I seem to
Hey again list,
Can anyone recommend a process for either cloning a cluster, or backing up
a whole cluster's data to restore elsewhere? This would be incredibly
useful for creating a new environment to test upgrades and run application
regression testing.
In the dark old days, it would be a simpl
Hey list,
I'm going to be doing our first full-cluster upgrade in production soon.
The docs suggest this is as easy as stopping a node, upgrading, and
restarting the node - doing each node one at a time. Before I start, It'd
be great if someone could confirm that I have this right.. :)
Thanks
Mat
If you have too few physical nodes in your cluster it is
not guaranteed that every replica will be on its own physical node. You'll
still have N replicas but some of them may be physically located on the
same physical node.
tl;dr add more machines to your cluster.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:06 PM,
Hi there,
Could someone please iterate in more detail what the following warning
means:
WARNING: Not all replicas will be on distinct nodes
My assumption is that there is not a clear replication of data across
nodes, if one goes down, data could be lost.
Cheers,
Drew Broadley
*PAPERKUT Paperle
Hello again :)
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Yousuf Fauzan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My riak setup is on EC2 with EBS volumes storing data and ring state. This
> ensures that I can teardown the cluster and restart it with all the data
> intact. When I restart the cluster, I do a reip of all nodes on
Any idea about random crashes?
On 11 Eyl 2012, at 15:19, Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Hi Wolf,
>
> eaddrnotavail in that error means that it can't bind to the network
> interface you specified. Verify that your HTTP and PB interfaces are
> bound to real IPs assigned to the machine and that the ports ar
Hey Yousuf,
I'm not sure there's a way to make this cheaper for you. You're going
to have to do a GET and work with the not-founds. The alternative
would be a HEAD request for the key, which would just return the
metadata. This won't save you any time on the request but might cut
down on client-se
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Deepak Balasubramanyam
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Sure, I can help whip up a page when I find the time. Do I get access to
> edit the wiki or should I email ro...@basho.com ?
>
Hmm. Sadly it looks like there's no pull request support for wiki
editing on GitHub. (Full
Hi Mark,
Sure, I can help whip up a page when I find the time. Do I get access to
edit the wiki or should I email ro...@basho.com ?
Thanks
Deepak Bala
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> In-line
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Deepak Balasubramanyam
>
Hi Deepak,
In-line
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Deepak Balasubramanyam
wrote:
> I was researching the same question and found the answer after some
> tinkering around. You need a JS source function. You must write the JS
> source code for the sort algorithm too.
>
> JSSourceFunction phaseFu
I was researching the same question and found the answer after some
tinkering around. You need a JS source function. You must write the JS
source code for the sort algorithm too.
JSSourceFunction phaseFunction = new JSSourceFunction(
"function(v) {" +
"return v.sort(functio
On 09/11/2012 07:47 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hey Antoine,
>
> Sorry for the delay here. Just for the sake of completeness, can you
> provide the MapReduce job that's not running?
>
> Mark
Hey,
Thanks for your answer ;)
It turns out I've managed to make it work, probably was an error in the
J
Hi Sean,
Ignore my last reply. It ok now. It was IP address as you said.
Thank you.
On 11 Eyl 2012, at 18:11, Wolf Iem wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> We are using default ports, 8098 - 8069 and IP addresses are correct. But
> still it doesn't start.
>
>
> On 11 Eyl 20
Hi Sean,
Thank you for your reply.
We are using default ports, 8098 - 8069 and IP addresses are correct. But still
it doesn't start.
On 11 Eyl 2012, at 15:19, Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Hi Wolf,
>
> eaddrnotavail in that error means that it can't bind to the network
> interface you specified. Ver
Hi Wolf,
eaddrnotavail in that error means that it can't bind to the network
interface you specified. Verify that your HTTP and PB interfaces are
bound to real IPs assigned to the machine and that the ports are not
in the privileged range (1-1024).
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Wolf Iem wrote
Hi Vladimir,
Yes, deleting an object is actually more expensive than just marking it
deleted. What happens is that Riak will delete it in two steps, first it
writes a tombstone record for the key, and then some time later it does the
real delete.
When you do a delete, riak will return success
Hi,
Just an idea, you could have a batch number incrementing once a
minute (Integers won't run out of range for at least 20 years) and have
your marking be an index name "delete_batch_number", and have a
scheduled job to delete once a minute or something where it will just
delete the keys w
HI all,
Is deleting a key more expensive operation then just marking it as deleted?
I noticed that delete a bunch of keys is quite expensive. All CPUs are
fully utilized.
I can imagine that I can mark the key first and delete them some time
later, e.q. not in rush hours.
What is actually the bes
Hi all,
We have 4 nodes Riak installation. They are running on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise
installed servers.
We have installed 1.1.4 at August 1st 2012 and upgraded 1.2.0 when its
available.
Server names are:
f1 - 10.10.0.12 - This is the first installed server. We have joined other ones
to t
23 matches
Mail list logo
