les that are supposed to be in some
location, if you move them or rename them then rhythmbox lost them,
then I guess it remove them from the playlist, because to rhythmbox
they don't exist anymore.
Regards,
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhythmbox-devel mailin
ved from the play queue. I
>> > want to change that behavior.
>>
>> Doesn't this overlap with playlists?
>
> Ok! I got it. I shall check the code for playlists and get back!
Maybe the point is that the the play queue does
I'm open to persuasion, but currently I feel this is the
> better option.
>
I was thinking about a window with the authentication form and Window
manager borders only. I don't see how the user could fell bad about
this, maybe is hard to implement.
Regards,
--
Edgar Luna
_
r (to rhythmbox or to last.fm) I feel that if you are
trying to integrate a web application with rhythmbox, then it should
seem that way and an embedded widget feels more integrated than
calling a browser.
Regards,
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
7;t help in that
sense. For example what you may see as "wasted space" I easily look at
it as a clean interface.
Now if you want to change the UI, in the sources shell/ grep for "gtk_".
Regards,
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhythmbox-devel
btw.
I don't know if this is enough but is what I know that is necessary.
Regards
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
#x27;s idea, now who's going to try do it?
Regards,
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
by leoslyrics.com"
This grabbers could be found in /usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins/lyrics in a
distribution installed Rhythmbox. Maybe someone could look at them and
make sure that all of them have a line like that.
Regards,
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhythmbox-d
eue comes in two modes as pane in the left side of rhythmbox or as a
playlist (you can change it with View-> Play Queue as a Side Pane), both
have useful behaviors check it out to see which one is the best for you.
Regards
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhyt
Hi
On 9/26/07, Karsten Schmiedecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007, tomás pollak wrote:
>
> > Another thing I've always wished for is the ability to define the
> > behaviour of the scrollwheel over the system tray icon. I know some
> > people like to control RB's volume
Hi
On 9/27/07, tomás pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > Umm, +1 on that. Actually, I have a Logitech-mouse with what they call a
> > > "tilt
> > > wheel", where you can tilt the mouse wheel to the left or right,
> > > triggering
> > > an event (Mouse Btn 7 or 8 or something like
Hi,
well my comments on your mockups.
On Dec 8, 2007 4:58 AM, Steven Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've included two layout ideas, each with two states: the sidebar and
> browser both visible, and both hidden. They only differ from each
> other in the ways the sidebar and browser are toggl
ne so I just
didn't but what are your toughts about it?
If you find a but on it don't hesitate to talk to me.
Best regards.
--
Edgar Luna
___
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
e from what you say is the visual feedback that
you don't get from the Browser.
And if that is the case and you want to implement it, as a nobody who
lkes and use rhythmbox I would like that this option be a gconf key. I
think preferences windows is very clean right now.
Regards,
--
Edgar Luna
_
Seem like my bad grammar generated a misunderstanding with Sol. What I
wanted to say is that my opinion is just from another user, so could
be easly ignored by him.
Sorry for the noise in the ilst.
Regards,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Edgar Luna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Su
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Martin Karlsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My opinion, however, is that Rhythmbox (if the play queue is empty) should
> contunue after the last played song (manually or queued), since it gives the
> user more control over the application.
I susbcribe to this opin
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Andrew Conkling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Martin Karlsson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> I (kind of) understand why you'd want this, but how does that give the user
> "more control"? And from which play source would you cont
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Conkling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Edgar Luna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This example makes sense, but only if what you put in the queue is #5 from
> that playlist. What if you put in a rand
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Andrew Conkling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Edgar Luna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Conkling
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
&
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Christian Bünnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The proposed behavior would break the way I am using Rhythmbox. I really
> like the party mode. Often I set up a playlist with some music for 2/3
> hours. However, my guests may browse the library and pick up songs to
20 matches
Mail list logo
