On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Jamie Nicol <ja...@thenicols.net> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 22:45 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: >> about that, please check for the "[Rhythmbox-devel] Updating to the new >> last.fm API" thread in the archives of the mailing list. As my first >> mail seems to have disappeared before it was sent by my mailer, I wanted >> to restate that embedding a web interface in a desktop application for >> something like this just doesn't feel right and I would rather stop >> using Last.fm plugin altogether that to have to endure the pain of such >> integration. >> > > After experimenting with both options, I feel I agree with you. There > are pros and cons to both. By embedding the browser there is no chance > of the user not seeing the page being opened, which is good. But it > leads to an awful mess. The user can then navigate to other pages from > within rhythmbox, which just doesn't seem right. > > So unless anybody else feels this is a mistake, I'm going to make it > open in an external web browser. I'll listen to any arguments anyone has > about this, and I'm open to persuasion, but currently I feel this is the > better option. >
I was thinking about a window with the authentication form and Window manager borders only. I don't see how the user could fell bad about this, maybe is hard to implement. Regards, -- Edgar Luna _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
