Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.4.0.1
Severity: wishlist
There is already a section about reproducibility in the debian-policy,
but it only mentions the binary packages. It might be a good idea to
add a new requirement that repeatedly building the source package in
the same environment produces
quot; binary; or do fancy things with a
> > debconf option sbuild-createchroot could inject but that would be too
> > dirty for me).
>
> I'm tempted to clone this bug and make the clone a wishlist bug for such
> a "policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all" bina
On 2020-09-09 11:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-09-09 08:33, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > control: tags -1 patch
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/policy-rcd-declarat
On 2020-09-10 11:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:45:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Well I would say that we have a solution but not yet the patch, but
> >
On 2020-09-10 14:17, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:14:57PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-09-10 11:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:45:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > &g
On 2016-01-06 17:29, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On Donnerstag, 24. Dezember 2015, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Yes, it's exactly that. The glibc was configured with a minimum kernel
> > set to 3.2. This allows to use the new features provided by the kernel
>
do the same process.
> So as far as I understand Henrik's original message, their problem should be
> fixed once packages start being built with sbuild from Stretch which happens
> after the Stretch release.
I don't know what is the issue you are talking about. If th
On 2017-08-28 18:06, Adam Warner wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
On 2017-08-28 12:42, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-08-28 12:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-08-28 18:06, Adam Warner wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > &
On 2017-08-28 12:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-08-28 18:06, Adam Warner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > >
On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > a) Has anything changed in the meantime?
> >
> > Yes: sbuild stopped repeating the changelog time taking i
ected by the bug. So it
mostly depends where the packages are built, not for which distribution.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
