On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:19:46PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> My reading of this is that (ignoring Debian-specific issues as they
> are an "easy" case IMHO) salsa becomes the single source of truth; ie.
> we both encourage and at least aim to forward/refile all "upstream"
> bugs to Salsa.
absolutl
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Rather (if we go this route), salsa will be the upstream bug tracker and
> the BTS will be for Debian issues. And like with all other packages in
> Debian, sometimes users will report upstream issues in the BTS and we as
> maintainers should (or could/can) forward them to th
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > any objections to me enabling them? :)
> Yes and no. :)
:)
> As in; I have nothing against moving to salsa (!) if we go that route,
> we should just first firmly decide whether the BTS or salsa is the
> canonical source of truth.
I
Holger Levsen wrote:
> > This is all fine, but issues on salsa diffoscope project are still
> > disabled.
>
> any objections to me enabling them? :)
Yes and no. :)
As in; I have nothing against moving to salsa (!) if we go that route,
we should just first firmly decide whether the BTS or salsa
