On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 10:42:50AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> That begs the question: what do we want to do with stretch?
I would like stretch to remain for QA purposes at least until we
release the last 9.x point release.
There are still some packages which FTBFS in stretch:
https://bugs.d
Hi,
Mattia, thanks for bringing this up!
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 10:42:50AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Today buster is being released, and I think we will do some shuffling to
> copy the buster data into the new bullseye shortly after, so we can
> start test for that as well.
yup. (though i'
Hi,
Today buster is being released, and I think we will do some shuffling to
copy the buster data into the new bullseye shortly after, so we can
start test for that as well.
That begs the question: what do we want to do with stretch?
I think it's not quite useful anymore to keep around, nothing
