[regext] Minutes for wg meeting at IETF 96 Berlin

2016-07-26 Thread Ulrich Wisser
Hi all! It seems I didn't send the minutes yet. Please find them below. I hope I got all the names right. Please mail me any correction. /Ulrich -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se REGEXT WG meeting at IETF 96 Berlin 20th July 2016 15:50-17:20 WG chair Jim Galvin opens meeting (Co-

Re: [regext] Minutes for wg meeting at IETF 96 Berlin

2016-07-26 Thread Ulrich Wisser
*From:* regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Ulrich > Wisser > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 7:20 AM > *To:* regext@ietf.org > *Subject:* [regext] Minutes for wg meeting at IETF 96 Berlin > > > > Hi all! > > > > It seems I didn't send t

[regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay

2016-07-28 Thread Ulrich Wisser
isign, the IESG will forward the document. /Ulrich -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

[regext] Minutes again

2016-07-29 Thread Ulrich Wisser
Here are the "new" minutes. Please check if your comments were fixed. /Ulrich -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se REGEXT WG meeting at IETF 96 Berlin 20th July 2016 15:50-17:20 WG chair Jim Galvin opens meeting (Co-Chair Antoin Verschuren remote) Signed-Mark has become RFC draft-i

[regext] Minutes

2016-08-01 Thread Ulrich Wisser
Hi there! Here comes the latest version of the minutes. Jim / Antoin would you load them up to the datatracker? /Ulrich -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se REGEXT WG meeting at IETF 96 Berlin 20th July 2016 15:50-17:20 WG chair Jim Galvin opens meeting (Co-Chair Antoin Verschuren remote

[regext] Implementations of draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01

2016-09-13 Thread Ulrich Wisser
Hi everybody! To finish the document shepherd writeup I would need to include references to implementations. Somebody who already has done this? Who plans on implementing? Thanks in advance! Ulrich -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se ___ regext

Re: [regext] Implementations of draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01

2016-09-15 Thread Ulrich Wisser
om:* regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Ulrich > Wisser > *Sent:* dinsdag 13 september 2016 9:12 > > > *To:* regext@ietf.org > *Subject:* [regext] Implementations of > draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01 > > > > Hi everybody! > &

Re: [regext] WG I-Ds in the IANA EPP Extensions Registry

2016-10-13 Thread Ulrich Wisser
rocess to be registered only after it has been > approved for publication as an RFC. Internet-Drafts are not guaranteed to > be published as RFCs, and the specifications they describe can change > before they are ultimately approved for RFC publication. > > > > Scott > _

Re: [regext] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-11-15 Thread Ulrich Wisser
o describe > secret/private values which aren't at issue here. (Or else > I'm mis-reading stuff:-) > > - nit, p8: s/previously send/previously sent/ > > - Section 6: I'm surprised that you don't recommend or even note > that the gaining registrar/dns

[regext] Clarify on RFC 5731

2016-11-15 Thread Ulrich Wisser
it is ok to never return domain:authInfo? /Ulrich -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] jabber scribe and notes taker

2016-11-17 Thread Ulrich Wisser
nce! > > Jim > > ___ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

2016-11-28 Thread Ulrich Wisser
rd Verisign's > IPR claim. > > > > +1 from me on this. > > > > Given all the argments I've seen on this list, going ahead seems to be > the only way out of this stalemate. > > jaap > > ________

Re: [regext] first reason not to do EPP and DNAME records?

2018-01-15 Thread Ulrich Wisser
gt; underway for a custom API for TLD->IANA changes that does not involve EPP. > I imagine shifting gears to replace that with an EPP interface would be a > significant undertaking by this time. > > > > ___

Re: [regext] Interest in collaborating on an EPP over HTTP draft?

2018-05-31 Thread Ulrich Wisser
what we want. And I don't think these properties of http/2 are very well understood currently. /Ulrich > > -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] WGLC: revised charter

2018-07-02 Thread Ulrich Wisser
> regext@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > -- > Kal Feher > Melbourne, Australia > > _______ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/li

Re: [regext] Poll messages with unhandled namespaces (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07.txt)

2018-07-16 Thread Ulrich Wisser
-- > Patrick Mevzek > > _______ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > ___ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Poll messages with unhandled namespaces (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07.txt)

2018-07-16 Thread Ulrich Wisser
dering the development of EPP Poll extensions for > no good reason. Out of sight - out of mind... > > Martin > > > > -- > *Von:* Ulrich Wisser [ulr...@wisser.se] > *Gesendet:* Montag, 16. Juli 2018 21:58 > *An:* Martin Casanova > *Cc:* Patric

Re: [regext] Poll messages with unhandled namespaces (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07.txt)

2018-07-17 Thread Ulrich Wisser
ese two last points I agree it is > also an easy solution to just send the message and expect the clients to > cope with it. > > > Martin > > -- > *Von:* Ulrich Wisser [ulr...@wisser.se] > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 17. Juli 2018 02:27 > > *An:* Martin

Re: [regext] [hrpc] Human Rights Review of draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode

2018-10-03 Thread Ulrich Wisser
rights. > > Regards, > > -- > > Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange > vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com > Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy > > ___ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

[regext] RegistryLock draft (as promised)

2019-03-29 Thread Ulrich Wisser
Hi, as promised at the Registry Lock side meeting and by Alex in the minutes from the meeting, here comes the link to my "secret" draft. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wisser-registrylock-00 Comments and improvements are of course welcome. /Ulrich

[regext] Update for .se extension

2019-11-06 Thread Ulrich Wisser
Designated experts, please consider the following update for the .se extension. Kind Regards /Ulrich -BEGIN FORM- Name of Extension: .SE extension Document Status: Informational Reference: https://registrar.iis.se/96 Registrant Name and Email Address:

Re: [regext] Update for .se extension

2019-11-07 Thread Ulrich Wisser
because we detected some inconsistencies in the IDN definitions. /Ulrich From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" Date: Wednesday, 6 November 2019 at 17:55 To: Ulrich Wisser , "epp...@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Update for .se extension Thanks, Ulrich. Is a summary of the changes avail

Re: [regext] Implementations of draft-wisser-registrylock?

2020-04-07 Thread Ulrich Wisser
Hi, I have made significant changes to the draft. Many thanks to contributions by Michael Bauland and Bernhard Reutner-Fischer. Please find the draft at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wisser-registrylock/ And please give it a review. If your registry currently offers or will offer regis

Re: [regext] Implementations of draft-wisser-registrylock?

2020-04-20 Thread Ulrich Wisser
something to work on for the future? /Ulrich Am Di., 7. Apr. 2020 um 18:57 Uhr schrieb Hollenbeck, Scott : > *From:* regext *On Behalf Of *Ulrich Wisser > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 7, 2020 11:28 AM > *To:* regext@ietf.org > *Cc:* Alexander Mayrhofer ; Bernhard > Reutner-Fischer ;

Re: [regext] Implementations of draft-wisser-registrylock?

2020-04-20 Thread Ulrich Wisser
out-of-band to their > clients. > > Also, there appear to be some dangling sentences in section 2. > > tim > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:57 PM Hollenbeck, Scott 40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> *From:* regext *On Behalf Of *Ulrich Wisser >