I believe the majority in the room in Seoul preferred to go forward. (I certainly indicated my support of moving forward.) Our area director seemed to have the same impression. So if there isn't an outcry on the list, that's what we're doing, right?
/Ulrich Jaap Akkerhuis <j...@nlnetlabs.nl> schrieb am Mo., 28. Nov. 2016 um 16:21 Uhr: > Miek Gieben writes: > > > > > > > [ Quoting <j...@instituut.net> in "Re: [regext] > draft-ietf-eppext-keyr..." ] > > >Dear Working Group, > > > > > >TL;DR: the working group should move forward and disregard Verisign's > IPR claim. > > > > +1 from me on this. > > > > Given all the argments I've seen on this list, going ahead seems to be > the only way out of this stalemate. > > jaap > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
