Hello,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai/
I am moving the document back to the working group.
Thanks to all who provided feedback and reviews on this draft, and for your
patience and support for our process.
This document has been stuck in AD Followup, but the changes d
I recommend requesting more time, and not requesting a side meeting.
OS, ART AD
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024, 10:58 AM Maarten Wullink
wrote:
> We were thinking about requesting an additional side-meeting to discuss
> how to best proceed with RESTful EPP, because there is not much time during
> the reg
for contact purposes. This could be used to mark an
> SMTPUTF8 address as primary. Is this worth exploring?
>
I think so, implementations should be able to tell if SMTPUTF8 is
supported, and in cases where multiple emails are allowed, which ones are
preferred, and how "preferred or pri
iated after this point?
If it helps I can do a full early AD review of the document.
Regards,
OS
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:43 AM Hollenbeck, Scott
wrote:
> *From:* Orie Steele
> *Sent:* Monday, June 10, 2024 4:44 PM
> *To:* Hollenbeck, Scott
> *Cc:* regext@ietf.org; regext-cha.
ve email address to address the feedback, then my
> recommendation is -19 (-20 is the same approach).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> JG
>
>
> [image: cid87442*image001.png@01D960C5.C631DA40]
>
>
> *James Gould *Fellow Engineer
> jgo...@verisign.com
&g
# Orie Steele, ART AD, comments for draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-14
CC @OR13
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-14.txt&submitcheck=True
Thanks to Anthony Somerset for the DNSDir early review.
Thanks to Andy Newton for the shep
Hi < responsible ad hat on>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024, 3:55 PM James Galvin wrote:
> I’m happy to provide some during the “admin” portion of our meeting for a
> discussion of this. If you want to kick this off that’s great too.
>
> As co-Chair, I will observe only that if you want a “standards track
Gavin, thanks for your comments.
Nothing major or blocking here, but still some clarifying questions on my
side.
Inline replies:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 4:41 AM Gavin Brown wrote:
> Hi Orie, comments below.
>
> > On 1 Jul 2024, at 23:30, Orie Steele wrote:
> >
> &g
Hi,
I said that we heard 2 paths forward:
- recharter / expand existing charter
- new working group
If you feel strongly about this topic, I welcome any comments on this list
or to me or the chairs privately.
There seems to be energy to do this work, I'll work with you all to find
the right app
-06. We think we addressed his feedback with the change noted above, but
> only he can say for sure. I don't want to revert to -05 or -06 only for him
> to give us the same "please change this" feedback during his formal AD
> review.
>
> Scott
> ___
> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
>
--
ORIE STEELE
Chief Technology Officer
www.transmute.industries
<https://transmute.industries>
___
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
Hi,
I was chatting with Paul Hoffman, about Restful EPP, and we were wondering
how many ccTLDs using EPP are following this list.
If you don't mind messaging me offlist, sharing a bit about yourself and
your thoughts on EPP / Restful EPP, I would appreciate it.
Regards,
OS, ART AD
_
Hi,
Thanks to James Galvin, Antoin Verschuren, and the REGEXT WG for the
discussion regarding Restful EPP.
As you know, we considered whether Restful EPP would be in scope for REGEXT.
Based on the discussions at IETF 120, it appears that the goal is not to
preserve EPP semantics or direct compat
__
> > IETF-Announce mailing list -- ietf-annou...@ietf.org To unsubscribe
> send an
> > email to ietf-announce-le...@ietf.org
> ___
> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
>
--
ORIE STEELE
Chief Technology Officer
www.transmute.industries
<https://transmute.industries>
___
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
orklow.
>
> > - In the XML the clID and crID are both frequently "ClientX" -- I wanted
> > to verify that this value is the right example value for both fields
>
> It's an arbitary string, but is used throughout the base RFC series and
> many su
Hi,
I've begun AD Sponsoring:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kowalik-domainconnect/
This document has previously been discussed in both REGEXT and DNSOP, I've
included some references in the data tracker history if you are interested.
I'm seeking a document shepherd volunteer, please mes
Hi,
Here is a clip of the EPP tutorial section from the RPP BoF:
https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf121-epp-tutorial
It cuts off right as Rick goes to the mic to say +1 Stefan and request that
the overview be clipped.
Thanks to Greg Wood for making it happen.
And thanks again to RPP BoF Chairs and
# Orie Steele, ART AD, comments for draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-08
CC @OR13
* line numbers:
-
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-08.txt&submitcheck=True
* comment syntax:
- https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comm
oposed changes are adequate.
>
>
>
> *From: *Orie Steele
> *Date: *Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 9:37 AM
> *To: *Registration Protocols Extensions
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [regext] AD Evaluation:
> draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-08
>
>
>
> *Caution:* This email or
at 05:15:49PM -0600, Orie wrote:
> > # Orie Steele, ART AD, comments for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-13
> > CC @OR13
> >
> > * line numbers:
> > -
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-se
If this is an error that should have been caught at the time of
publication, I am happy to mark an errata verified for it.
You can still correct any errata that are verified in a bis document.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, 6:52 AM Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gould
Hi,
Closing off this thread, I have processed both of the related errata:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3915&rec_status=15&presentation=table
Regards,
OS, ART AD
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 4:47 AM Gavin Brown wrote:
> If the schema in the RFC is authoritative, then we have a
21 matches
Mail list logo
