Hi, Thanks to James Galvin, Antoin Verschuren, and the REGEXT WG for the discussion regarding Restful EPP.
As you know, we considered whether Restful EPP would be in scope for REGEXT. Based on the discussions at IETF 120, it appears that the goal is not to preserve EPP semantics or direct compatibility. Accordingly, proponents have developed: - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-wullink-restful-provisioning-protocol/ Interested parties are welcomed to engage on the newly formed mailing list: - https://mailman3.ietf.org/mailman3/lists/rpp.ietf.org/ Please centralize discussion of the BoF Req or charter discussion on the RPP list above. If you have comments regarding this topic which you do not feel comfortable sharing on a public list, you may send them to me privately. Regards, OS, ART AD
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
