[regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-04.txt

Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-04.txt To: Jacques Latour , Paul Wouters , Matthew Pounsett , Olafur Gudmundsson < olafur+i...@cloudflare.com> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-04.txt has been success

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-03.txt

On 16 June 2017 at 10:03, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Dear authors, > > I could finally find some time to make a more thorough personal (chair-hat > off) preliminary review on this document. > Here are my comments: > Hi Antoin. My apologies for taking so long to getting around to replying. :) I

Re: [regext] first reason not to do EPP and DNAME records?

On 15 January 2018 at 13:09, John R Levine wrote: > Already replied but see >> >> > > This answer just confirms my main point. Whether to put DNAMEs in the > root is primarily a policy question. Even if you thought it was

Re: [regext] Review of draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-04

Hi Patrick. Thanks for your patience in waiting on a reply from me.. as I mentioned in private email at the time you sent your mail, the winter/spring has been a bit complicated. Also, thanks very much for your thorough review. I think we're still a long way from a good Standards Track document.

Re: [regext] Review of draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-04

On 7 January 2018 at 18:28, Patrick Mevzek wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017, at 07:03, Patrick Mevzek wrote: > > Hello authors, > > > > Please find below my review of your draft. > > Please also have a look at > https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hildebrand-deth-00.txt > as it covers related goals