On 15 January 2018 at 13:09, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> Already replied but see >> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lGdwGFO58iJ_dYYM9UR87Er9F5c> >> > > This answer just confirms my main point. Whether to put DNAMEs in the > root is primarily a policy question. Even if you thought it was a good > idea (which I still don't, see next message) there is no point to inventing > an EPP extension unless and until there is a policy that lets them use it. > > If merely having the EPP feature was all it took, we'd have sunrise and > redemption periods in the root. > > Perhaps I missed this upthread somewhere, but before we start talking about EPP extensions for managing the root, shouldn't we talk about using EPP to manage the root? Last I heard (May 2017, Spain) there was work underway for a custom API for TLD->IANA changes that does not involve EPP. I imagine shifting gears to replace that with an EPP interface would be a significant undertaking by this time.
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
