blunt idea from my side, and not thought through yet 😊.
Forgot to mention thank you for taking the lead in this draft, as it’s
mentioned a lot in OARC meetings that this would help in the daily DNS
operations…
Best regards,
Marc Groeneweg
From: regext on behalf of Gavin Brown
Date
solution. And we surely don’t want to
deviate from the DNS standards 😊
Best regards,
Marc Groeneweg
From: Brian Dickson
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2023 at 20:22
To: Marc Groeneweg
Cc: Gavin Brown , regext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [regext] [Ext] New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-regext-epp
paragraph: EPP servrers -> EPP servers.
That’s for now. Still looking into another scheme to make this to succeed…
Best regards,
Marc Groeneweg
From: Brian Dickson
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2023 at 20:22
To: Marc Groeneweg
Cc: Gavin Brown , regext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [regext] [
needed. The reason for asking is that there is a
fast silent majority in this working group.
>I would appreciate if working group members would respond to the second
>question on the list.
We second that and ask people to state their opinion on the mailinglist on this
specific issue.
Best
+1 I agree. It seems there is a rough consensus formed by the overwhelming
silence within this WG regarding this keyrelay draft. Let’s move on!
From: regext on behalf of Rik Ribbers
Date: Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 08:44
To: Antoin Verschuren
Cc: Job Snijders , "ali...@cooperw.in" ,
Scott
+1 Please move forward.
From: regext on behalf of Rik Ribbers
Date: Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 11:38
To: Job Snijders
Cc: "Livesay, Paul" , Antoin Verschuren
, "ali...@cooperw.in" , "regext@ietf.org"
, Stephen Farrell
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on
All,
>> I've been giving some thought to the possibility of writing up a proposal
>> for a generic organization
>>object that can be compared to the proposal we have for a reseller object
>>since the topic came up
>>at last week's meeting.
>
> […]
> > We could add an IANA registry for o
Jim,
It should work for us too. And indeed, the minimum from the current login as
already accepted as default, so why not hold on to this...
Regards,
Marc
On 11/06/2018, 20:11, "regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott"
wrote:
Works for me, Jim.
Scott
> -Original Mess
All,
At SIDN (for .nl) we have our own form of registry lock called .nl control
(https://www.sidn.nl/en/nl-control?language_id=2). Perhaps this can be used as
input for a joined effort in increasing security around registry/registrar
operations.
Regards,
Marc Groeneweg
On 25/02/2019, 14:57
not the point
really.
Hope to hear from you all :-).
Best regards,
Marc Groeneweg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
10 matches
Mail list logo
