Hi Gavin, I am going to review your draft. I see you’re using a ttl object for adding, updating and removing ttls on a role type. Is it also an idea to extend existing objects (domain and host) with a ttl field? I know this is a different approach and perhaps more complex. But when I look at an example on changing a hostObj with 2 IPv4 addresses the ttl for “A” will apply for both IPv4 addresses I guess. When extending on separate fields it should be possible to get a ttl for each address right? And then there’s no need to give a ttl a role like “A” or “AAAA”.
Really, it’s just a blunt idea from my side, and not thought through yet 😊. Forgot to mention thank you for taking the lead in this draft, as it’s mentioned a lot in OARC meetings that this would help in the daily DNS operations… Best regards, Marc Groeneweg From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Gavin Brown <gavin.br...@icann.org> Date: Monday, 11 September 2023 at 14:28 To: regext@ietf.org <regext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [regext] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt [Some people who received this message don't often get email from gavin.br...@icann.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> ] Hi all, Please look at this document. It contains a "straw man" implementation of a syntax for supporting TTLs for different record types. I do not personally like this syntax but have struggled to find one that both (a) seems intuitive and (b) can be fully validated using only the XML schema: the *easy* approach would be to have looser XML schema and then use MUSTs and MUST NOTs in the text, but I'd like to avoid that if I can. So, I am asking for suggestions on how to do it better. I would be very sad if the current model ended up being the final one! G. On 10/09/2023, 14:00, internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Gavin Brown and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl Revision: 02 Title: Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values Date: 2023-09-05 Group: regext Pages: 18 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl> Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02 <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02> Abstract: This document describes an extension to the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) that allows EPP clients to manage the Time-To-Live (TTL) value for domain name delegation records. About this draft This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. The source for this draft, and an issue tracker, may can be found at https://github.com/gbxyz/epp-ttl-extension <https://github.com/gbxyz/epp-ttl-extension>. The IETF Secretariat -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, GDS Technical Services Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org <https://www.icann.org> _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
