Hi Gustavo,
I have also comment on your draft:
Does it make sense to apply the extension to the transfer command and query? The
unspoken principle until now seemed to me to be that the transfer command does
not carry any "advance" settings for the domain once transferred to the new
registra
On 11/12/17 5:20 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
We actually do not use DNAME for IDN Variants at DotAsia. IDN Variants are
delegated to the same set of NS as the primary IDN for .Asia. Nevertheless,
its prob good to revisit having a standard IDN Variant provisioning
extension (again) now with the progr
On 04.10.18 14:26, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
-Original Message-
From: regext On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:42 AM
To: Gould, James
Cc: hr...@irtf.org; h...@irtf.org; regext@ietf.org; gurshabad@cis-
india.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Human Rights
Hi Scott et al.,
sorry for proposing the following so late in the discussion. Due to
other duties, my visits to the list were less frequent in the recent
time. Looking at the two options - update of RFC 5733 or an extension -,
I probably would tend to the first option, but I understand the p
On 19.11.20 16:37, Gould, James wrote:
Klaus,
[...]
2. Implicit Replacement Based on Login Services – Inclusion of the
namespace URI in the greeting and login services indicate support
for EAI addresses implicitly. This would be treated similar to an
EPP extension with the names
On 19.11.20 19:14, Gould, James wrote:
Klaus,
The EAI support goes beyond RFC 5733 and is a perfect example of the use of the
extensibility built into EPP. Revising the RFCs and EPP extensions that use
email addresses for EAI with new XML namespaces and potentially other changes
is much more
On 20.11.20 14:37, Taras Heichenko wrote:
Right - it's a lot MORE work.
Let's ask Klaus what takes more developer's work, changing namespace, or adding
the extension generation and parsing.
(In the neighbor thread Klaus wrote that his company is developing EPP
software.)
Hi,
well, for t
On 21.04.22 11:09, Martin Casanova wrote:
Hello
I was stumbling over a rather theoretical problem and I was hoping to
get some feedback from the group.
Given a with a instead of a
extension what would be the correct answer ?
Precondition: The domain would not yet exist and therefore als
On 21.04.22 17:34, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 21 April 2022 16:35:25 CEST, "Gould, James"
wrote:
+1 on the use 2103/"Unimplemented extension". This is a broader topic with the
passing invalid or conflicting extensions (e.g., restore request extension of update
along with the sync ex
