Re: [regext] Review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-09

lue can be returned in the responses. However, I can live with Option #3 where the RFC acknowledges that placeholder text has been used in the past. Thanks, Jody Kolker. From: Pawel Kowalik Sent: Friday, November 25, 2022 1:50 AM To: Gould, James ; draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redac...@ietf.org Cc: re

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai Path Forward

I also support cardinality of one. Thanks, Jody. From: regext On Behalf Of Rick Wilhelm Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 8:26 AM To: Roger D Carney ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai Path Forward Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click lin

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-regext-brown-epp-ttl

+1 to adopt. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 3:54 PM To: regext Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-regext-brown-epp-ttl Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unl

Re: [regext] I-D draft-latour-pre-registration

nt of view, should this extension be sent with the check command instead of the create command? The object is not created but is being verified, more of a check (even though the objects may be temporarily created). Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor

Re: [regext] WG Adoption Request: draft-hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp

I support the adoption and am willing to provide feedback of the draft. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney (scourt...@godaddy.com<mailto:scourt...@godaddy.com>) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments her

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning draft-newton-regext-rdap-extensions draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type

+1 Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney (scourt...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you

Re: [regext] EPP Transport Service Discovery

adding a service discovery system compared to the amount of time it will take to design and implement. I would rather we spend our time defining the separate transport system than designing a discovery system. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott

Re: [regext] EPP Transport Service Discovery

>> . . I believe the rate limiting and exclusivity or non-exclusivity on a >> single transport as server policy and out of scope for the definition of the >> transports. +1 – that seems like server side policy and should not be handled here. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805

[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-08

and objects. Although this is not needed, I support publication also. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney (scourt...@godaddy.com<mailto:scourt...@godaddy.com>) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is in

[regext] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-considerations-on-rfc9537-00.txt

SON Values is a clear indication of the entity that has been redacted without the use of the JSON path. I'm not convinced that an entirely new draft is necessary. I'd like to see more implementations before the RFC is updated and/or dismissed. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805  (mobile

[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03

+1. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805  (mobile)   Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney (scourt...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If

[regext] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9537 (8006)

two hours. He stated that GoDaddy's case is pretty simple and the RFC was straightforward to implement. Has anyone else tried to implement the RFC with the additional Errata? Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney (scourt...@godaddy.com)

[regext] Re: [Ext] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9537 (8006)

It is a server - sorry I didn't make that very clear. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney (scourt...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s)

Re: [regext] regext - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 96

+1 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Rik Ribbers Date: 7/21/16 12:43 PM (GMT+01:00) To: Gustavo Lozano Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] regext - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 96 Gustavo, I have been reading htt

Re: [regext] Agenda items for IETF97

Hi Anton, Is there any chance of moving this meeting to a non-Friday slot? Many people are probably leaving on Friday and would miss this meeting. Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, October

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-02.txt: currency error handling, command wildcard

domain is not available for registration. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbeadn...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-02.txt: currency error handling, command wildcard

d a fee. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbeadn...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confide

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbeadn...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

future. I'm not concerned with the cost in the past as I have already been charged for that cost and I should have logging or other form of documentation to prove it. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbea

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

Alex wrote: >> No. Each fee involved would need to be equal or over the fee required by the server. >> Agreed. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbeadn...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This e

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

we have rarely seen prices go down for registrations, it could happen after the customer has purchased the domain. This might be such a small issue that it could be overlooked, but wanted to bring it up. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct

Re: [regext] Using RDAP as a Domain Availability Service

+1 Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbeadn...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-03.txt

Thanks James. Comments in line below. From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 2:56 PM To: Roger D Carney ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-03.txt Roger, Thanks for posting the updated dr

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-03.txt

I am good with option #1; the response returns “avail=0” if one of the commands fails. However, the command could either return the reason code for the one failing command, or any commands that had been checked with their reason codes. If all commands were considered invalid, would the respons

Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal

, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Galvin Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 12:55 PM To: Roger D Carney Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal On 16 Jun 2017, at 12:40, Roger D

Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal

I will be joining the session. Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Corte Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:20 AM To: regext@ietf.org Cc: supp...@tango-rs.com Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal Hello, On

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

time without a phase/subphase, what should be returned? Options: 1. Return an error - no phase/subphase specified. 2. Return the fee for GA phase. 3. Return the fee for the next phase in the future. 4. Return the fee for all future phases. Thoughts? Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Hi Thomas, Are the premium names only available in the General Availability phase or are they available in Landrush or any other early access phases? Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Corte Sent: Monday, August 07

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

o create the premium domain. It only needs the correct phase? Is that correct? Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbeadn...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Sorry for the spread out questions. Thomas - In your implementation, is the premium phase specified in the "phase" attribute or in the "subphase" attribute? Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thoma

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Thanks Thomas. Comments below - JWK. Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: Thomas Corte [mailto:thomas.co...@knipp.de] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 11:46 AM To: Jody Kolker ; Gould, James ; regext@ietf.org Cc: supp...@tango-rs.com Subject: Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

reserved list basically the domain could be registered if the domain was not in a quiet period). Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:43 PM To: Roger D Carney ; regext@ietf.org Subject

Re: [regext] review draft-ietf-regext-change-poll

I have read the document and would like to see it move forward. This is a change that we would like to see implemented in the future. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

ase? Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Charles Beadnall (cbeadn...@godaddy.com<mailto:cbeadn...@godaddy.com>) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) na

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

Hi Jim, We do not have any intention at this time of implementing this draft. We have no desire to send reseller information to the registry due to competition concerns. We believe there is no reason for the registry to require this suite of information. Thanks, Jody Kolker From: regext

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

not own. Thanks, Jody Kolker From: Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rube...@nic.br] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 7:12 AM To: Gould, James Cc: Jody Kolker ; James Galvin ; Linlin Zhou ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension Isn't the sponsoring registrar al

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I will also be there. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Moninder Jheeta (mjhe...@godaddy.com<mailto:mjhe...@godaddy.com>) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the add

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

I will be there. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Moninder Jheeta (mjhe...@godaddy.com<mailto:mjhe...@godaddy.com>) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addre

Re: [regext] WGLC: revised charter

+1 Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 11:07 AM To: Kal Feher ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WGLC: revised charter +1 — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061

Re: [regext] Poll messages with unhandled namespaces (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07.txt)

if the DNS-Operator is not the registrar? Is the DNSSEC data set without the registrar knowing it was added? If so, how? Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Martin Casanova Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 2:09 PM To: Patrick Mevzek ; regext@ietf.org Subject:

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

entities. >> The reason for changing the 2nd bullet “*Data formats for files exchanged between registration entities that need insertion in or extraction from EPP or RDAP.” Is that the data reports are not downloaded via EPP or RDAP. Thanks, Jody Kolker From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin

Re: [regext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gould-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-00.txt

most TLDs. Would be curious to hear from other registrars and registrys on this topic. Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 12:46 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] FW: New Version Notification for draft

Re: [regext] Side meeting about "Domain Suggestion APIs" - any interest?

Please add me to the list also. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please

Re: [regext] Domain Suggestion Side Meeting: Tuesday, 0900, Olivia

Hi Alex - do you know if you have the ability for remote participation for this meeting. Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Alexander Mayrhofer Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 8:38 PM To: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: [regext] Domain

Re: [regext] Registry Maintenance Notifications for the EPP

Hi Patrick, Here are our responses inline. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jody. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 2:27 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] Registry Maintenance Notifications for the EPP

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items for IETF 109

Hi Antoin, I would like to request 15 - 20 minutes to discuss an UnRenew extension for EPP. Thanks, Jody Kolker. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 8:59 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [regext] Call for agenda items for IETF

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces and draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer Document Track

Jim, Changing from BCP to standards track looks acceptable to me. Thanks, Jody. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 11:43 AM To: shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org; p...@dotandco.com; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext]

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03

Thanks for the feedback Jim! We are reviewing and will get back to you From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:55 AM To: gal...@elistx.com; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03 Notice: This email is f

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03

Thanks for the detailed feedback Jim and apologies for the late reply. Responses are inline. Please let us know if you have any questions. Jody. From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 2:28 PM To: gal...@elistx.com; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CA

[regext] Mail regarding draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer

Hi Jim (Gould) and Rick, Does this draft contain any IPR? We’ll need to know in order to complete the review for the submission. Thanks, Jody Kolker. GoDaddy ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Mail regarding draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer

I’m sorry Jim – I just saw this. I’ll get working on this today. From: Gould, James Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 10:21 AM To: Jody Kolker ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] Mail regarding draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer Notice: This email is from an external sender. Jody

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

+1 From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 9:00 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis Notice: This email is from an external sender. Dear WG, WGLC for this document officially ended last night. U

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-09

+1 -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Tobias Sattler Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 1:57 AM To: Antoin Verschuren Cc: regext Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-09 Notice: This email is from an external sender. +1 > On 4. Jan 2

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

Nope – Support for 7483bis also. From: regext On Behalf Of Wilhelm, Richard Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 7:54 AM To: shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org; i...@antoin.nl; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Notice: This email is fro

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-jcard-deprecation-03

Hi everyone, I support its adoption as well. Thanks, Jody Kolker. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Maurizio Martinelli Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 6:14 AM To: James Galvin Cc: REGEXT WG Subject: Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-jcard

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-belyavskiy-epp-eai

I support adoption. Thanks, Jody Kolker. From: regext On Behalf Of Jiankang Yao Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 1:43 AM To: Tobias Sattler ; Mario Loffredo Cc: Antoin Verschuren ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-belyavskiy-epp-eai Caution: This email is from an

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12.txt

ave any questions or comments Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Michael Bauland Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 4:23 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12.txt Hi, I have reviewed the document

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

ave any questions or comments. Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Thomas Corte (TANGO support) Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 6:31 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance Hello, On 3/29/21 14

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12.txt

ted by the maintenance such as the customer support phone system, SFTP or FTP service, marketing portals, reporting portals, customer service portals etc. I might be tying a little to much in here. Thoughts? Thanks, Jody Kolker. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Michael Ba

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

of maintenance emails that arrive constantly. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jody Kolker. From: regext On Behalf Of Marcel Parodi Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:40 AM To: Antoin Verschuren ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry

[regext] Adoption of draft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted Document

-redacted document. We have identified a document shepherd if the draft is adopted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jody Kolker GoDaddy ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-16

5730 regarding security considerations. We will publish the document with additional changes after our AD requests publication. Please let us know if anything else is needed. Thanks, Jody Kolker. -Original Message- From: Melinda Shore via Datatracker Sent: Sunday, August 8, 2021 10

Re: [regext] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17

Thanks Harald for the detailed review of the document. Please see our comments in line below. Thanks again! Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: Harald Alvestrand via Datatracker Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 3:14 AM To: a...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF 112

Hi Antoin, I would like to request 10-15 minutes to discuss the RDAP redaction submission if possible. Thanks, Jody Kolker. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 8:20 AM To: regext Subject: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: (with COMMENT)

Eric, Thank you for review and comments. We've added our replies in line below. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jody. -Original Message- From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 10:46 AM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: (with COMMENT)

Roman, Thank you for review and comments. Please find our responses in line below. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jody. -Original Message- From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 10:58 AM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-regext-epp-reg

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: (with COMMENT)

Thanks for the feed back Erik. Apologies for missing this on v17. We have updated the document to v18 and included the updated suggested. https://github.com/seitsu/registry-epp-maintenance/blob/master/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance.txt Thanks! Jody Kolker. -Original Message

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

+1 From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 7:55 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 You don't often get email from ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org. Learn why this is

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

questions. Thanks, Jody Kolker. From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 3:59 PM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-07.txt

Thank you Dmitry. @Jim (Gould) and Dimtry - Does this draft contain any IPR? We'll need to know in order to complete the review for the submission. Thanks, Jody Kolker. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Dmitry Belyavsky Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:15 PM To: r

[regext] Document Shepard Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-07

updated to address the items above, I'll submit the Shepard Document. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks Everyone! Jody Kolker ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-08.txt

Thank you Dmitry! I've reviewed the draft and it appears that all items mentioned have been addressed. I will submit the Shepard Document once we have sign off from James Gould regarding IPR; unless I have missed that email (which is entirely possible)? Thanks, Jody Kolker. -Ori

Re: [regext] Document Shepard Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-07

Thanks Jim - I'll prepare the Shepard Document. Jody Kolker. From: Gould, James Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 4:34 PM To: Jody Kolker ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] Document Shepard Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-07 Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please d

[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING

I’m interested as well. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney (scourt...@godaddy.com<mailto:scourt...@godaddy.com>) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s)