Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review the
proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-23 for us?
Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/
The due date is Augu
Dear Authors/Chairs/ADs,
Please see below for a question from one of the experts.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
--
I wish I had asked this during the WG discussion, but I do have a question.
Section 12.2.1 paragraph 3 states:
"The designated expert should prevent coll
Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review the
proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-24 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid/
The due date is September 5th.
If th
Dear John, Brian, and Michael (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the JSON Web Token Claims registry, can you
review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-24 for us?
Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid/
The due date is Sept
Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review the
proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-14 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted/
The due date is September 14th.
Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the RDAP JSON Values registry, can you review the
proposed registration, "jsonpath", in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-14 for
us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted/
The due date is Se
Hi Martin Thomson, Tim Bray,
As the designated expert for the XML ns and schema registries, can you review
the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
The due date is August 13th.
If this is OK, when
Dear Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regext WG),
As the designated expert for the Extensions for the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
T
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the ns and schema registries, can you review the
proposed registrations in draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-10 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
The due date is November 22nd.
If
Dear Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the Extensions for the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-17 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
T
Hi Scott,
Just to note, you last reviewed -15 and it looks like the author addressed your
feedback from that review, but we will wait for your approval again.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Fri Nov 08 20:47:48 2024, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regex
Hi Tim, Martin,
Just to note, you had last reviewed -15, and it looks like the author had
addressed your feedback from that review.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Fri Nov 08 20:25:58 2024, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: regext WG),
>
> As the
Hi Orie,
This errata affects the Registry Maintenance Notification EPP Mapping Schema
(https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/epp/maintenance-1.0.xsd);
do you want us to update the .xsd file and add this errata as an additional
reference to "epp:maintenance-1.0" in
https://www.ia
Dear Scott (cc: regext WG),
Could you request for the designated secondary experts for the Extensions for
the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) registry to review the proposed
registration in draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-23 for us? As you're a co-author on
this draft, we would need one of the
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you review
the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-23 for us? You've
previously reviewed -10 of the I-D. Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regex
Dear Mark Nottingham, Julian Reschke, Jan Algermissen (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the Link Relation Types registry, can you review
the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-14 for us?
Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ri
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the Structured Syntax Suffixes registry, can you
review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us?
Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed/
The due
Dear Andy Newton, Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review the
proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed/
The due date is March
Dear Mark Nottingham, Julian Reschke, Jan Algermissen (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the Link Relation Types registry, can you review
the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please
see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Structured Syntax
Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-r
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Structured Syntax
Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-r
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Structured Syntax
Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-r
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Structured Syntax
Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-r
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Structured Syntax
Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-r
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Structured Syntax
Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-r
; active" and "top-active". Consider defining a separate "active"
> relation type (again, either generically, or specific to your
> application, depending on your preferences), which can then be used in
> combination with other types -- e.g., "top active" and
ompound link relation types, e.g., "up-
> > active" and "top-active". Consider defining a separate "active"
> > relation type (again, either generically, or specific to your
> > application, depending on your preferences), which can then be used in
> &g
API WG would be amenable to such work.
> > >
> > > Alternatively, you could register link relation types specific to
> > > your
> > > application; for example, "rdap-up" and so forth.
> > >
> > > I also notice that you define
Dear Andy Newton, Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions, RDAP Reverse Search and RDAP
Reverse Search Mapping registries, can you review the proposed registrations in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-14 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.o
; From: Alexey Melnikov
> Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 9:44 AM
> To: drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org comm...@iana.org>
> Cc: dar...@tavis.ca , regext@ietf.org
>
> Subject: [regext] Re: [IANA #1414868] expert review for draft-ietf-
> regext-rdap-geofeed (media-type-stru
t: [regext] Re: [IANA #1414868] expert review for draft-ietf-
> > regext-rdap-geofeed (media-type-structured-suffix)
> > On 02/05/2025 18:35, David Dong via RT wrote:
> >
> > Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG),
> >
> >
> >
> > Following
31 matches
Mail list logo
