Dear Authors, Just a follow-up on this; thank you.
Best regards, David Dong IANA Services Sr. Specialist On Thu Feb 27 19:08:09 2025, jasd...@arin.net wrote: > Hi David, > > We, the authors, are aware of this feedback and would be addressing it > soon. > > Thanks, > Jasdip > > From: David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> > Date: Thursday, February 27, 2025 at 1:55 PM > To: > Cc: regext@ietf.org <regext@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir- > search....@ietf.org <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search....@ietf.org> > Subject: [IANA #1413017] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir- > search (link-relations) > Dear Authors/Chairs/ADs > > Please see below for comments from the expert. > > Best regards, > > David Dong > IANA Services Sr. Specialist > > On Tue Feb 18 19:54:52 2025, david.dong wrote: > > Dear Authors/Chairs/ADs > > > > Please see below for comments from the expert. > > > > Best regards, > > > > David Dong > > IANA Services Sr. Specialist > > > > On Sun Feb 16 08:28:46 2025, m...@mnot.net wrote: > > > David et al, > > > > > > Section 10.2 has a title of "Link Relations Registry" but the URL > > > given is "https://www.iana.org/assignments/rdap-extensions/ > > > rdap-extensions.xhtml" -- it looks like the intent is to register > > > link relations given the content of the entries, so the URL needs > > > to > > > be corrected. > > > > > > Assuming that's the case, I see that 'up' is already registered, so > > > that registration is not necessary. > > > > > > Both that and the remaining requests are extremely generic terms, > > > and > > > so aren't appropriate to register in a specific protocol's > > > document; > > > experience shows that doing so misleads readers to believe that > > > these > > > terms are specific to that protocol and not useable elsewhere. > > > > > > Instead, I'd suggest registering them in a separate, standalone > > > document, using generic descriptions that are broadly applicable; > > > your > > > document can then refine their semantics in a specific context. I > > > suspect the HTTPAPI WG would be amenable to such work. > > > > > > Alternatively, you could register link relation types specific to > > > your > > > application; for example, "rdap-up" and so forth. > > > > > > I also notice that you define compound link relation types, e.g., > > > "up- > > > active" and "top-active". Consider defining a separate "active" > > > relation type (again, either generically, or specific to your > > > application, depending on your preferences), which can then be used > > > in > > > combination with other types -- e.g., "top active" and "up active". > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 Feb 2025, at 3:23 pm, David Dong via RT <drafts-expert- > > > review- > > > comm...@iana.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mark Nottingham, Julian Reschke, Jan Algermissen (cc: regext > > > > WG), > > > > > > > > As the designated experts for the Link Relation Types registry, > > > > can > > > > you review the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-regext-rdap- > > > > rir- > > > > search-14 for us? Please see: > > > > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir- > > > > search/ > > > > > > > > The due date is February 28th. > > > > > > > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for > > > > publication, > > > > we'll make the registrations at: > > > > > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/ > > > > > > > > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on > > > > the > > > > first response we receive. > > > > > > > > With thanks, > > > > > > > > David Dong > > > > IANA Services Sr. Specialist > > > > > > -- > > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
