[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING

Yes, interested to participate in a virtual setup. Kind regards, Pawel On 02.04.25 16:21, James Galvin wrote: Speaking as co-Chair: A virtual interim meeting is certainly an option and available. Meetings can also be held in person but I’m assuming you’re asking for a virtual meeting. Plan

[regext] Re: simplifying the extensions rules

+1 Mario Il 02/04/2025 15:03, Pawel Kowalik ha scritto: +1 Kind regards Pawel On 1. Apr 2025, at 21:59, Jasdip Singh wrote:  Hi all, Since this Extensions draft would be a useful contribution for clarifying the RDAP extensibility, and that there are other drafts waiting on it for a mo

[regext] Re: simplifying the extensions rules

+1 Kind regards Pawel > On 1. Apr 2025, at 21:59, Jasdip Singh wrote: > >  > Hi all, > > Since this Extensions draft would be a useful contribution for clarifying the > RDAP extensibility, and that there are other drafts waiting on it for a more > definitive naming guidance, would it be mo

[regext] PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING (was: simplifying the extensions rules)

Speaking as co-Chair: A virtual interim meeting is certainly an option and available. Meetings can also be held in person but I’m assuming you’re asking for a virtual meeting. Planning is different if it’s going to be a meeting in person. Let’s first start with who is willing and would att

[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING

So am I. Mario Il 02/04/2025 16:22, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto: I’m interested and willing to attend virtually depending on the date and time. Scott *From:* James Galvin *Sent:* Wednesday, April 2, 2025 10:21 AM *To:* Jasdip Singh *Cc:* Andrew Newton (andy) ; regext@ietf.org *Subject:*

[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING

+1 -- JG [cid87442*image001.png@01D960C5.C631DA40] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com From: Mario Loffredo Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 10:28 AM To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" , "gal...@elistx

[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING

+1 Looks like an hour should suffice. Thanks, Jasdip From: Gould, James Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 10:29 AM To: mario.loffredo=40iit.cnr...@dmarc.ietf.org , shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org , gal...@elistx.com , Jasdip Singh Cc: a...@hxr.us , regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [

[regext] Re: simplifying the extensions rules

Hi Andy, On 02.04.25 16:31, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote: [...] In fact "the rules" set in 2.1 of RFC9083 are no rules, but a recommendation (SHOULD) itself. So I argument actually to keep the status quo of RFC9083 as opposed to defining new rules as now the change of -05 proposes. I agree t

[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING (was: simplifying the extensions rules)

I am interested in attending this meeting Victor, building Namefi for digital trust and future Internet. https://namefi.io On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 15:53 Tom Harrison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 10:21:18AM -0400, James Galvin wrote: > > A virtual interim meeting is certai

[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING (was: simplifying the extensions rules)

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 10:21:18AM -0400, James Galvin wrote: > A virtual interim meeting is certainly an option and available. Meetings > can also be held in person but I’m assuming you’re asking for a virtual > meeting. Planning is different if it’s going to be a meeting in person. > > Let’s f

[regext] Re: PLEASE RESPOND: INTERIM MEETING PLANNING

Jim, I'd be happy to lead the discussion if there are no other volunteers. -andy, no hat On 4/2/25 10:21, James Galvin wrote: Speaking as co-Chair: A virtual interim meeting is certainly an option and available. Meetings can also be held in person but I’m assuming you’re asking for a virtua