[regext] [IANA #1414868] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed (media-type-structured-suffix)

2025-04-01 Thread David Dong via RT
Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: regext WG), Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Structured Syntax Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-r

[regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09

2025-04-01 Thread Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker
Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody Review result: Has Nits # OPSDIR Review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-09 I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written to improve the operational

[regext] media-types feedback on RDAP-X

2025-04-01 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hi, Andy sent a note [1] to the media-types mailing list for guidance on whether we need a new media type “application/rdap-x+json” with the “extensions” parameter for content negotiation in RDAP (option 1), or if adding the “extensions” parameter to the existing “application/rdap+json” media t