Hi,

Andy sent a note [1] to the media-types mailing list for guidance on whether we 
need a new media type “application/rdap-x+json” with the “extensions” parameter 
for content negotiation in RDAP (option 1), or if adding the “extensions” 
parameter to the existing “application/rdap+json” media type should suffice per 
Pawel’s earlier input [2] (option 2). The feedback we got is to take the 
simpler approach and do the latter (option 2). To that end, we’d be updating 
the RDAP-X draft (including the title :)) and then share here for further 
review.

Thanks,
Jasdip

[1] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/?gbt=1&index=RnzrjNmF5pf13GKoQEcy2kJ1134
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/k56aWaWSnGMTSjqPCvo5lGrY-aA/

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to