A clear +1 for adoption of DoH.
For DoQ I share the opinions expressed in the room in IETF 119 session,
that benefits from adding this transport are not clear, so I don't think
we should spend cycles on this draft until this is better answered.
Adding this new transport on a Standard track wou
I support adoption of draft-yao-regext-epp-quic.
As the author of draft-loffredo-regext-epp-over-http, don't believe my
vote in favor can count :-)
Mario
Il 03/02/2025 15:05, James Galvin ha scritto:
Continuing our potential adoption of new documents, as previously discussed the
next two do
Hi Jim,
Got it. Is it a problem to solve or solution looking for a problem?
Kind regards,
Pawel
On 04.02.25 14:38, Gould, James wrote:
Pawel,
I will mirror what I stated at the IETF 119 session, that there are economies
of scale to have both EoH and EoQ progress at the same time. Based on
Pawel,
I would state that it’s providing an additional option for server and client
implementers based on the advantages and disadvantages of each of the
transports. EoT has worked well for many years, EoH provides enhanced Cloud
capabilities, and EoQ provides some interesting security and pe
Pawel,
I will mirror what I stated at the IETF 119 session, that there are economies
of scale to have both EoH and EoQ progress at the same time. Based on my
implementation experience with EoQ, it has security and functional advantages
over EoT. Specifically, the encryption is setup ahead of
Hi all,
This call for adoption closed yesterday.
We have 4 people that support and no rejections, with 2 people raising
concerns, so the chairs consider this document adopted with remarks.
We will adopt the document so work can start, but the chairs want the authors
to know that we will evaluat
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Ready
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area
Directors. Document authors, document edi
Hi Antoin, Jim,
Scott Hollenbeck has graciously agreed to be the document shepherd for this
draft. :)
Jasdip
From: Jasdip Singh
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 12:51 PM
To: Antoin Verschuren , regext
Subject: [regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-jasdips-regext-rdap-rpki
Hi Antoin, Jim,
Hi Antoin, Jim,
Version 00 of this draft has now been submitted. Good idea to have the RPKI
experts also review it.
We’d next look for the document shepherd. :)
Thanks,
Jasdip
From: Antoin Verschuren
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 11:57 AM
To: regext
Subject: [regext] Re: CALL FOR ADOPTI
