[regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-02.txt

Andy, It may be useful to include guidance for RDAP extensions use of the RDAP JSON Values registry in the extensions draft. I believe that new RDAP extensions should be encouraged to support standard values to increase interoperability, where extending the RDAP JSON Values registry is better

[regext] FW: New Non-WG Mailing List: rpp (a provisioning protocol based on RESTful principles and corresponding data representations using JSON)

This may be of interest to people here. Scott > -Original Message- > From: IETF Secretariat > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 3:13 PM > To: IETF Announcement List > Cc: r...@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] New Non-WG Mailing List: rpp (a provisioning protocol > based on RESTful principles

[regext] RPP

Hi, Thanks to James Galvin, Antoin Verschuren, and the REGEXT WG for the discussion regarding Restful EPP. As you know, we considered whether Restful EPP would be in scope for REGEXT. Based on the discussions at IETF 120, it appears that the goal is not to preserve EPP semantics or direct compat

[regext] Re: FW: New Non-WG Mailing List: rpp (a provisioning protocol based on RESTful principles and corresponding data representations using JSON)

Thanks Scott! Indeed, I was carefully reviewing my summary for this group, which just landed here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/sGlc9i-MnRiTDclSh8Ww5AJAPgk/ If there are other working groups we should provide a similar notice to, I welcome you to raise this with their respective