On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:27:43AM -0500,
James Galvin wrote
a message of 18 lines which said:
> This is the formal adoption request for DNS Data Dictionary:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/
OK for adoption, since this is a real issue and this
This draft seems to be rather confused about what its purpose is.
As others have pointed out it talks about “DNS”, but in reality its focus seems
to be on domain names and their registrants.
It says it’s merely a “dictionary” but then goes on to make very clear policy
decisions eg. 2.30
It also i
Stephane, Michele, et al,
Thanks for your comments. We're looking forward to adjusting the
descriptions, removing any policy bias, etc., etc. We were advised to wait
until the WG adoption decision has been made, hopefully fairly soon.
Steve
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 5:23 AM Michele Neylon - Blac
