This draft seems to be rather confused about what its purpose is. As others have pointed out it talks about “DNS”, but in reality its focus seems to be on domain names and their registrants. It says it’s merely a “dictionary” but then goes on to make very clear policy decisions eg. 2.30 It also includes terms that are not in anyway standard as if they were eg. 2.8, 2.9, 2.11
Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of James Galvin <gal...@elistx.com> Date: Monday, 20 December 2021 at 14:28 To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources. This is the formal adoption request for DNS Data Dictionary: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by REGEXT and comment to the list, clearly stating your view. This Call For Adoption will close on Monday, 10 January. If there are no objections, the chairs will consider this document adopted. Thanks, Your REGEXT co-chairs Antoin and Jim _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
