One other item that is important is the chosen namespace URI. Based on the
latest EPP RFCs, IANA wants the namespace URI to be scoped with “epp”, so the
namespace URI needs to be changed to
“urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0”. We made a similar change to the
Registry Fee Extension in
Thanks for the feedback Jim! We are reviewing and will get back to you
From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:55 AM
To: gal...@elistx.com; regext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL:
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03
Notice: This email is f
Thanks for the note, Dmitry. I get what you’re trying to do, but I don’t think
we can update Standard 69 (the set of EPP RFCs) this way. I’m not aware of any
RFCs that expressly prohibit such things, but it’s a topic that the IESG has
debated multiple times over the years and there might not be
Dear Scott,
Many thanks for your response!
I'm sorry, I don't feel the difference between this case and a similar
update of X.509 profile by RFC 8399.
And, as the email field is mandatory on creating the contact, I don't think
that the extension is the best way.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:13 PM H
An extension was used to override the type of the RFC 5730 password and new
password element in the Login Security Extension
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8807). In the case of the Login Security
Extension, a pre-defined placeholder value is used in the RFC 5730 password or
new password elem
RFC 8399 is a Proposed Standard RFC that updates RFC 5280, another Proposed
Standard. RFCs 5730 – 5733 are Internet Standards (RFC 2026 describes the
difference in maturity levels), and as such the barrier for updates tends to
be higher. The EPP RFCs are aging, and yes, we’re finding things that
Dear James and Scott,
Many thanks for your clarifications and example!
Will soon return with an updated draft!
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:37 PM Gould, James wrote:
> An extension was used to override the type of the RFC 5730 password and
> new password element in the Login Security Extension (
>
In article <5f28bdeb6cbe4d3fa9bf9b969b170...@verisign.com> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>Thanks for the note, Dmitry. I get what you’re trying to do, but I don’t think
>we can update Standard 69 (the set of
>EPP RFCs) this way. ...
Regardless of the standards politics, I don't think it would be a good
Dear John,
fair point!
The suggested model with dummy value and extension seems to be a relevant
signal.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 9:17 PM John Levine wrote:
> In article <5f28bdeb6cbe4d3fa9bf9b969b170...@verisign.com> you write:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >Thanks for the note, Dmitry. I get what you’re tr
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Domain Name Registration Data (DNRD) Objects Mapping
Authors : Gustavo Lozano
Thank you Roman,
Comments below are prefixed with Authors-.
A new version of the I-D has been published here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-10.txt
Regards,
Gustavo
On 8/24/20, 12:30, "Roman Danyliw via Datatracker" wrote:
Roman Danyliw has entered the fo
Thank you Warren,
Comments below are prefixed with Authors-.
A new version of the I-D has been published here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-10.txt
Regards,
Gustavo
On 8/25/20, 09:36, "Warren Kumari via Datatracker" wrote:
Warren Kumari has entered the f
Thank you Murray,
Comments below are prefixed with Authors-.
A new version of the I-D has been published here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-10.txt
Regards,
Gustavo
On 8/26/20, 23:45, "regext on behalf of Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker"
wrote:
Murray
Thank you Éric,
Comments below are prefixed with Authors-.
A new version of the I-D has been published here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-10.txt
Regards,
Gustavo
On 8/25/20, 11:51, "Éric Vyncke via Datatracker" wrote:
Éric Vyncke has entered the followi
Thank you Benjamin,
Comments below are prefixed with Authors-.
A new version of the I-D has been published here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-10.txt
Regards,
Gustavo
On 8/26/20, 23:30, "Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker" wrote:
Benjamin Kaduk has entered t
Thank you Erik,
Comments below are prefixed with Authors-.
A new version has been published here:
Regards,
Gustavo
On 8/25/20, 17:47, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" wrote:
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-09: No Objection
Hi Gustavo!
Thanks for answers below and addressing my comments in -09. Please consider my
feedback resolved.
Thanks,
Roman
> -Original Message-
> From: Gustavo Lozano
> Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 5:44 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapp..
17 matches
Mail list logo
