In article <5f28bdeb6cbe4d3fa9bf9b969b170...@verisign.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >Thanks for the note, Dmitry. I get what you’re trying to do, but I don’t think >we can update Standard 69 (the set of >EPP RFCs) this way. ...
Regardless of the standards politics, I don't think it would be a good idea to unilaterally change the meaning of the address field. It will take a while for registries to upgrade to handle EAI mail and they need some way to signal to the registrars that EAI addresses will work. -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
