On 3 April 2017 at 19:56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 3 April 2017 16:21:55 CEST, Andrew Newton wrote:
>>On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>> On 22 March 2017 at 13:58, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>>> 4) Domain object, secureDNS/delegationSigned
>>>
>>> --
On 12 October 2016 at 02:46, Francisco Arias wrote:
> FYI,
>
>
>
> There is an updated proposal to handle the RySG proposed revision to the
> CL&D policy to remove the requirement to implement RDAP. We are planning to
> put a draft updated CL&D policy for public comment before the end of the
> mon
On 23 March 2017 at 19:38, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 23 March 2017 16:38:31 CET, Andrew Newton wrote:
>>On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
> 2) entity handles
>
> At least for DNRs the mixture of registrars and contacts seems to
>>be
a
>
Thank you for the suggestion, Bernhard. We'll take it into consider if the
document is revived, as you said.
--
Francisco
On 9/12/17, 2:00 AM, "Bernhard Reutner-Fischer" wrote:
On 12 October 2016 at 02:46, Francisco Arias
wrote:
> FYI,
>
>
>
> There is an updated pro
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Third Party DNS operator to Registrars/Registries
Protocol
Authors : Jacques Latour
We've submitted a new version of the Third-Party Operator draft for review.
There's one outstanding issue–brought up at the Prague meeting–regarding
conflict resolution of data received via multiple update mechanisms (e.g.
EPP and CDS) which the authors are in disagreement about. We're submittin
