Hi Roger,
Since we had no objections, I’m about to issue this interim meeting request.
2 small administration questions:
-How long will the meeting last (estimate, I have put 1 hour for now).
-Could you or expected attendees provide a bulleted list of issues you would
like to address or talk abou
Hello,
On 2017-06-27 10:27, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> And for the WG:
> To give the chairs and organizer a sense of participation, since this
> will be our first interim meeting, who on this mailinglist is thinking
> of joining this session?
I'm going to join the session (assuming that I can ge
I will be joining the session.
Thanks,
Jody Kolker
-Original Message-
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Corte
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:20 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Cc: supp...@tango-rs.com
Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal
Hello,
On 2017
Roger,
Never say the “last revision” ☺. Below is my feedback to the 04 draft:
1. Nit – Tag braces need to be fixed in “domain > command when no
extension to define a new Fee
Check Command, as defined in option #2 in the regext list
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/2nZMuj9
I'll attend.
Scott
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 AM
To: Roger D Carney
Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal
Hi Roger,
Since we had no objections
Hello,
On 2017-06-24 17:50, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions of the
> IETF.
>
> Title : Registry Fee Extension for the Exten
