Hello all,
I'm with Antoine - i think a generic "organization" object that can fulfill
"roles" with regards to an "object" would be better than a object definition
that's only useful for one single reseller use case. Even more complicated
"chains" of resellers [rolling eyes] could be implemente
Hello Matthieu,
On 17/03/2017 18:19, Matthieu Jacob wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about the delete command and precisely about the
> response when you delete a domain which is in autoRenewPeriod and the
> registrar has fee extension selected during the login, do we need to
> give the amo
Hello,
On 09/03/2017 00:11, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions of the
> IETF.
>
> Title : Registry Fee Extension for the Exten
Hello,
another oddity I noticed in draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-02.txt:
Since "objectCheckType" (for check commands) and "objectCDType" (for
check responses) now practically contain the same elements (and both
reference "commandType"), it is possible for a registrar to specify fees
and credits alon
Inclusion of grace period credits is timed based (logic executed at the time of
the delete) and is much more involved than returning the applicable prices.
The extension of the availability check command in
draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-02 is already far beyond what is reasonable for an
extension
